top of page

Acute Diarrhea in Dogs: Evidence-Based Nutritional Management

 

VetFarmacy Clinical Evidence Library

Body System: Gastrointestinal Nutrition

Author: Dr. Athena Angela Gaffud

Content Type: Condition Evidence Overview

Evidence Base: Peer-reviewed veterinary and translational literature synthesis

Last Reviewed: 2026

Purpose: Evidence-based synthesis of current veterinary and translational literature evaluating nutritional management strategies in acute diarrhea in dogs

Evidence Transparency

 

This article synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed veterinary clinical trials, systematic reviews, microbiome research, and translational studies related to the pathophysiology and nutritional management of acute diarrhea in dogs.

Because many cases of acute diarrhea are self-limiting and heterogeneous in etiology, available evidence includes a combination of randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and mechanistic research examining intestinal inflammation, epithelial injury, and microbiome disruption. Where direct clinical evidence is limited, mechanistic and cross-species data are used to inform nutritional strategies.

Distinctions are made between strong evidence (e.g., randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews), emerging evidence (e.g., microbiome and functional ingredient studies), and extrapolated evidence (e.g., mechanistic or non-canine data).

This content is intended for educational interpretation of veterinary nutrition research and does not replace individualized veterinary medical care.

Introduction

 

Acute diarrhea in dogs is defined as the sudden onset of decreased fecal consistency and/or increased frequency, typically lasting less than 14 days. It is one of the most common gastrointestinal presentations in primary veterinary practice, with multifactorial etiologies including dietary indiscretion, abrupt diet change, infectious agents, toxins, and transient microbiome disruption.

Population-level data confirm its clinical relevance. In a large primary care cohort, acute diarrhea accounted for a substantial proportion of gastrointestinal consultations, often managed empirically despite variable adherence to evidence-based protocols (O’Neill et al., 2025; Singleton et al., 2019). Importantly, prescribing patterns frequently diverge from current guidelines, with overuse of antimicrobials despite limited indication (Francillon et al., 2023; Jessen et al., 2024).

From a clinical nutrition standpoint, acute diarrhea represents a failure of intestinal homeostasis involving epithelial barrier disruption, altered secretion and absorption, and dysregulated host–microbiome interactions. Nutritional intervention is therefore not merely supportive but mechanistically central to recovery. 

This positioning is reinforced by current clinical guidance, which increasingly recognizes dietary management as a first-line intervention in uncomplicated acute diarrhea, rather than an adjunct to pharmacologic therapy. In many cases, early nutritional correction addresses the underlying pathophysiology—particularly osmotic imbalance and microbiome disruption—more directly than symptomatic drug use. As a result, diet selection is among the earliest and most impactful clinical decisions in case management (Morrow, 2025; Scahill et al., 2023). 

Acute diarrhea is typically self-limiting in many dogs; however, variability in duration, recurrence risk, and progression to chronic enteropathy introduces clinical uncertainty. Epidemiological data suggest that while most cases resolve within a few days, a subset may persist or recur, particularly when underlying dietary triggers or microbiome instability are not addressed (O’Neill et al., 2025). This creates a critical window where early nutritional intervention can influence not only short-term resolution but also long-term gastrointestinal stability.

In practice, inappropriate or delayed dietary management may contribute to prolonged clinical signs and unnecessary pharmacologic intervention, including antimicrobial use, despite evidence that many uncomplicated cases resolve with supportive care alone (Scahill et al., 2023; Jessen et al., 2024).

For a broader context on the digestive system, see the Canine Gastrointestinal System.
For foundational evidence, see the VetFarmacy Evidence Library on gastrointestinal nutrition. 

Pathophysiology of Acute Diarrhea

 

Acute diarrhea arises from overlapping mechanisms that disrupt normal intestinal function. These include inflammatory signaling, epithelial injury, metabolic dysregulation, and microbiome imbalance.

Inflammation and immune activation

 

Luminal antigens—whether dietary, microbial, or toxin-derived—activate innate immune pathways, leading to cytokine release (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β). This increases epithelial permeability by disrupting tight junction proteins, allowing further antigen translocation and perpetuating mucosal inflammation (Candellone et al., 2020). Clinically, this manifests as increased fluid secretion and reduced absorptive capacity. 

 

Key tight junction proteins such as claudins and occludins are downregulated during inflammatory states, leading to increased paracellular permeability. This allows luminal toxins, bacteria, and dietary antigens to cross the epithelial barrier, amplifying immune activation in a feed-forward cycle. Loss of barrier integrity is therefore not only a consequence of inflammation but also a driver of ongoing disease activity. 

 

Cellular injury and oxidative stress

Reactive oxygen species generated during inflammation induce oxidative damage to enterocytes. Lipid peroxidation of cellular membranes impairs transport proteins and mitochondrial function, limiting ATP-dependent nutrient absorption. This contributes to both secretory and osmotic diarrhea. Antioxidant depletion further delays mucosal repair.

Metabolic dysfunction

Enterocyte injury reduces enzymatic activity and transporter expression, impairing the digestion and absorption of macronutrients. Undigested substrates increase luminal osmolarity and are fermented by colonic bacteria, exacerbating diarrhea through gas production and osmotic load. Reduced short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production deprives colonocytes of their primary energy source.

Microbiome disruption and immune signaling

Acute dysbiosis is characterized by decreased microbial diversity and expansion of opportunistic taxa. This alters fermentation pathways and immune signaling, further destabilizing intestinal homeostasis (Bai et al., 2023). Changes in microbial metabolites influence epithelial repair, inflammation, and motility.

In particular, reductions in short-chain fatty acids, such as butyrate, impair colonocyte energy supply and tight-junction integrity, while increases in proteolytic fermentation products (e.g., ammonia, phenols) may exacerbate mucosal irritation. These metabolomic shifts represent a key interface between diet and disease mechanisms, reinforcing the importance of fermentable substrates and fiber composition in nutritional management strategies (Fritsch et al., 2022). 

Lipid-mediated effects

Dietary fat influences bile acid secretion and intestinal motility. Excess luminal fat can increase secretion and alter microbiome composition, particularly in dogs with reduced digestive capacity. This can worsen clinical signs in some cases.

Clinical relevance

From a physiological standpoint, acute diarrhea can be broadly categorized into osmotic and secretory components, which often coexist. Osmotic diarrhea results from the presence of non-absorbed solutes in the intestinal lumen, drawing water into the gut. This is commonly driven by maldigestion or malabsorption of nutrients secondary to epithelial injury.

In contrast, secretory diarrhea is mediated by active ion transport processes, often triggered by inflammatory mediators or enterotoxins that increase chloride secretion and inhibit sodium absorption. This results in net water efflux into the intestinal lumen, independent of dietary intake.

At the cellular level, this process is mediated by activation of cyclic AMP and calcium-dependent signaling pathways that stimulate chloride secretion via CFTR channels while inhibiting sodium absorption. The resulting electrolyte imbalance drives passive water movement into the intestinal lumen, contributing to high-volume diarrhea.

These distinctions are clinically relevant because nutritional strategies targeting digestibility primarily address osmotic mechanisms, whereas anti-inflammatory and microbiome-modulating approaches may influence secretory pathways.

These mechanisms collectively result in fluid loss, electrolyte imbalance, and impaired nutrient utilization. Nutritional strategies must therefore target:

  • Restoration of epithelial integrity: Supports barrier repair and reduces antigen translocation.

  • Modulation of inflammation: Limits cytokine-driven secretion and tissue damage.

  • Normalization of microbial metabolism: Restores SCFA production and gut stability.

  • Reduction of osmotic load: Improves fluid balance and stool consistency.

Nutritional Risk Factors

Dietary factors frequently act as initiating or exacerbating triggers in acute diarrhea.

 

Macronutrient imbalance

Poorly digestible proteins and excessive fermentable carbohydrates increase luminal substrate availability for bacterial fermentation, raising osmotic pressure and promoting diarrhea. Low-quality ingredients may also increase antigenic exposure, amplifying mucosal immune responses. 

In addition, diets that are poorly digestible or imbalanced in fermentable substrates may promote dysbiosis by selectively enriching bacterial populations associated with inflammation. This shift in microbial ecology can alter metabolite production, favoring compounds that impair epithelial health and exacerbate clinical signs. 

Fat composition and load

High-fat diets can delay gastric emptying and increase bile acid secretion. In susceptible dogs, this may lead to bile acid–induced colonic secretion and motility changes, thereby worsening the severity of diarrhea.

Abrupt dietary change

Sudden transitions disrupt microbiome equilibrium and metabolic adaptation. This disruption reflects a lag in microbial adaptation to new substrates, leading to inefficient fermentation and accumulation of intermediate metabolites. The resulting instability can manifest as increased gas production, osmotic load, and altered motility, all of which contribute to clinical diarrhea. Gradual dietary transitions allow for microbial and enzymatic adaptation, reducing this risk.  Experimental data show that rapid diet changes significantly alter fecal fermentation patterns, microbiota composition, and metabolomic profiles, increasing the likelihood of diarrhea (Liao et al., 2023).

Ultra-processed diets

Highly processed diets may influence nutrient bioavailability and microbial interactions, although evidence remains heterogeneous. Processing methods can alter protein structure and fiber functionality, potentially affecting digestibility and gut health.

Contaminated or novel food exposure

Dietary indiscretion—common in dogs—introduces pathogens, toxins, or unfamiliar substrates that disrupt intestinal balance.

For supporting evidence on diet-related triggers and microbiome disruption, refer to the Evidence Library on gastrointestinal disease mechanisms.

Evidence-Based Nutritional Strategies

Fat

Mechanism: Dietary fat stimulates bile acid secretion and influences intestinal motility. Excess fat increases luminal bile acids, which can induce colonic secretion and diarrhea.

Clinical relevance: Reducing fat intake may improve tolerance in fat-sensitive individuals and reduce the risk of secretory diarrhea. However, fat restriction is not universally required in all acute cases. 

In fact, excessive restriction of dietary fat in dogs without demonstrated fat intolerance may unnecessarily reduce energy density and impair caloric intake during recovery. Clinical assessment should therefore guide fat modification, rather than applying uniform restriction across all cases. This highlights the importance of individualized dietary planning based on patient response and suspected pathophysiology. 

Evidence classification: Moderate evidence supports selective fat restriction based on clinical context rather than routine use (Guilford & Matz, 2003).

Protein

Mechanism: Protein digestibility determines the amount of substrate reaching the colon. Undigested protein undergoes putrefactive fermentation, producing ammonia and other metabolites that irritate the mucosa.

Clinical relevance: Highly digestible proteins reduce colonic fermentation and improve nutrient absorption. Hydrolyzed proteins further reduce antigenicity, minimizing immune-mediated responses in cases of food sensitivity. Hydrolysis reduces the molecular weight of proteins below the threshold required for immunogenic recognition, thereby limiting activation of mucosal immune responses. This is particularly relevant in cases where increased intestinal permeability exposes the immune system to luminal antigens.

In addition to reducing antigenicity, highly digestible protein sources decrease the delivery of nitrogenous substrates to the colon, thereby limiting proteolytic fermentation and the production of potentially toxic metabolites. This dual mechanism—immune modulation and substrate reduction—supports both symptomatic improvement and mucosal recovery (Ing & Steiner, 2024).

Clinically, this makes hydrolyzed diets particularly valuable not only as therapeutic interventions but also as diagnostic tools in elimination diet trials. Failure to respond to a hydrolyzed diet within an appropriate timeframe may help rule out food-responsive enteropathy and prompt further investigation into alternative causes. 

Evidence classification: Strong evidence supports hydrolyzed diets for diagnostic and therapeutic management of gastrointestinal disease (Ing & Steiner, 2024).

Carbohydrates and Fiber

Mechanism: Soluble fibers are fermented into SCFAs, which enhance water absorption, support colonocyte metabolism, and modulate inflammation. This inflammatory response is not isolated to the gastrointestinal tract but reflects broader immune system activation, linking gut health to systemic inflammatory pathways. 

Insoluble fibers increase fecal bulk and regulate transit time. Butyrate, in particular, serves as the primary energy source for colonocytes and plays a critical role in maintaining epithelial integrity by promoting tight junction assembly and anti-inflammatory signaling. Propionate and acetate also contribute to systemic metabolic effects, linking local gut health to broader physiological regulation. 

Clinical relevance: Fiber type and inclusion level influence stool consistency and recovery speed. Balanced fiber profiles support microbiome normalization.

Different fiber types exert distinct physiological effects. Soluble, fermentable fibers, such as fructo-oligosaccharides, promote beneficial microbial populations and SCFA production, while insoluble fibers, such as cellulose, contribute to fecal bulk and regulate transit time.

Recent clinical trials demonstrate that fiber-enriched diets not only improve stool consistency but also accelerate microbiome recovery, suggesting that fiber acts as both a mechanical and metabolic intervention in acute diarrhea (Holz et al., 2024; Lappin et al., 2022).

Evidence classification: Strong evidence supports mixed-fiber diets in acute large bowel diarrhea (Lappin et al., 2022; Holz et al., 2024).

Micronutrients

Mechanism: Electrolytes maintain fluid balance, while antioxidants mitigate oxidative damage. Vitamins such as A and E support mucosal integrity.

Clinical relevance: Micronutrient support is particularly important in moderate-to-severe diarrhea with fluid loss.

Evidence classification: Emerging evidence supports antioxidant and polyphenol supplementation in reducing oxidative stress and supporting recovery (Candellone et al., 2020).

Functional Ingredients in Acute Diarrhea

  • Omega-3 fatty acids: Anti-inflammatory modulation and membrane stabilization

  • Probiotics: Competitive exclusion of pathogens, modulation of immune signaling, and restoration of microbial balance 

  • Glutamine: Primary fuel for enterocytes, supporting mucosal repair and barrier integrity

  • MCT oil: Rapidly absorbed energy source that bypasses standard lipid digestion pathways

  • Postbiotics: Bioactive microbial metabolites that influence immune and epithelial function

These compounds, including short-chain fatty acids, bacteriocins, and microbial cell wall fragments, exert effects independent of live microbial colonization. This may offer advantages in acute disease states where gastrointestinal conditions are unfavorable for probiotic survival, positioning postbiotics as a potentially more stable therapeutic option. 

Biotics can be categorized into probiotics (live microorganisms), prebiotics (substrates selectively utilized by host microorganisms), synbiotics (combinations of probiotics and prebiotics), and postbiotics (non-viable microbial products or metabolites). Each class exerts distinct effects on microbial composition, immune modulation, and epithelial function. 

Clinical evidence supports the use of probiotics to reduce the duration and severity of diarrhea (Shmalberg et al., 2019; Nixon et al., 2019; Jensen & Bjørnvad, 2019). Fiber-prebiotic combinations further enhance microbiome recovery and metabolic function (Fritsch et al., 2022).

While probiotic efficacy is supported by multiple randomized controlled trials, variability in strain selection, dosing, and study design introduces heterogeneity in outcomes. Systematic reviews conclude that probiotics are beneficial overall, but effects are context-dependent and should be interpreted within the clinical context (Jensen & Bjørnvad, 2019; Schmitz, 2024). 

Dietary Approaches

Therapeutic gastrointestinal diets are formulated to maximize digestibility, control macronutrient composition, and incorporate functional additives. These diets are designed to reduce intestinal workload and support recovery.

Fresh or minimally processed diets may improve palatability and intake, particularly in dogs with reduced appetite. However, their efficacy depends on formulation quality and nutrient balance. Therapeutic diets are designed to deliver consistent nutrient profiles and functional additives with established clinical evidence, whereas fresh or minimally processed diets may vary widely in composition. While improved palatability may enhance intake, variability in digestibility and nutrient balance can influence clinical outcomes.

From a mechanistic perspective, the key determinant is not processing method alone but how the diet influences digestibility, microbial fermentation, and immune activation. This distinction is critical when translating dietary preferences into clinical decision-making.

In real-world settings, caregiver compliance, cost, and practicality of feeding also influence diet selection. Even nutritionally optimal diets may fail to achieve clinical benefit if adherence is inconsistent. Therefore, effective dietary strategies must balance clinical efficacy with feasibility to ensure sustained implementation. 

Evidence suggests that nutritional management alone may be sufficient in many cases of uncomplicated acute diarrhea and may outperform antimicrobial therapy in appropriate cases (Rudinsky et al., 2022; Scahill et al., 2023).

VetFarmacy Clinical Resource

Readers who want a structured overview of how veterinarians select diet strategies for gastrointestinal conditions can access the VetFarmacy clinical guide:


Veterinary Diet Decision Framework for Dogs
This reference summarizes evidence-based diet strategies used for gastrointestinal disease, food allergy, metabolic disorders, kidney disease, and joint health. It explains how nutritional decisions are matched to underlying disease mechanisms and clinical presentation.

Clinical Outcomes and Evidence Summary

 

What works (strong evidence): Highly digestible diets, fiber supplementation, probiotics, and targeted nutritional interventions improve clinical resolution.

 

In many uncomplicated cases, clinical improvement is expected within 24–72 hours of initiating appropriate dietary management. Delayed response beyond this window may indicate more complex underlying pathology, including infectious, inflammatory, or dietary hypersensitivity components, which require further evaluation. 

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that nutritional management alone can achieve outcomes equal to or superior to those of antimicrobial therapy in uncomplicated cases, reinforcing diet as a first-line intervention rather than an adjunctive therapy (Rudinsky et al., 2022; Pignataro et al., 2021). 

 

What is uncertain (emerging evidence): Polyphenols, postbiotics, and advanced microbiome-targeted therapies show promise but require further validation.

 

What is limited (extrapolated evidence): Optimal macronutrient ratios and individualized dietary strategies remain areas of ongoing research.

For a deeper synthesis, refer to the Evidence Topic on gastrointestinal nutrition and the Evidence Library.

Clinical Decision Support

 

Dietary intervention is a primary management tool in acute diarrhea, particularly when systemic illness is absent. Clinical decision-making should consider:

  • Presence of systemic signs (e.g., lethargy, dehydration)

  • Evidence of large vs small bowel involvement

  • Frequency and recurrence of episodes

  • Response within 48–72 hours of initial dietary intervention

Early response to dietary modification is a useful clinical indicator, as a lack of improvement may suggest alternative or more complex underlying disease mechanisms requiring further diagnostic evaluation. In uncomplicated cases, early dietary intervention improves recovery and reduces reliance on pharmacologic treatments.

Conversely, the presence of worsening clinical signs, persistent diarrhea beyond several days, or the development of systemic abnormalities (e.g., dehydration, hematochezia, lethargy) should prompt escalation of care. In such cases, dietary management remains important but must be integrated with diagnostic investigation and broader therapeutic strategies. 

To evaluate structured dietary strategies and determine appropriate pathways, compare diet strategies for this condition

What to Feed: Translating Evidence Into Practice

Diet selection should be guided by the underlying disease mechanisms, clinical severity, and individual response to previous dietary interventions. The options below summarize how different dietary strategies are typically applied in clinical practice.

Each dietary pathway targets different aspects of the underlying pathophysiology—whether reducing antigen exposure, improving digestibility, or enhancing intake. Selecting the appropriate approach, therefore, depends on identifying the dominant mechanism driving clinical signs in each patient. 

Pathway 1: Low-Fat Diets

Use when: Fat sensitivity is suspected, or clinical signs worsen after high-fat intake

Clinical rationale: Reducing dietary fat may decrease intestinal stimulation and improve tolerance in fat-sensitive gastrointestinal conditions
 

Compare low-fat diet options for this condition.

Pathway 2: Hydrolyzed Diets

Use when: Diarrhea persists, or food-responsive enteropathy is suspected

Clinical rationale: Hydrolyzed diets reduce antigen exposure and are commonly used in elimination diet trials
 

Compare hydrolyzed diet options for this condition.

Pathway 3: Fresh / Minimally Processed Diets

Use when: Appetite is reduced, or feeding compliance is a concern

Clinical rationale: Fresh diets may improve palatability and intake, supporting recovery depending on formulation
 

Explore fresh diet options for this condition.

How to Choose Between These Options

  • For acute or severe presentations → controlled therapeutic diets are typically preferred

  • For chronic or unresolved cases → elimination diets may be necessary

  • For stable conditions → diet selection depends on tolerance and response

Compare Diet Strategies for Acute Diarrhea in Dogs

Selecting the appropriate diet depends on disease severity, underlying mechanisms, and clinical response.

Explore structured decision pathways: compare diet strategies for this condition

These options reflect different clinical pathways. Selecting the correct approach depends on identifying whether digestibility, antigen exposure, or intake is the primary limiting factor. 

Key Takeaways

  • Acute diarrhea: Rapid disruption of intestinal homeostasis

  • Inflammation: Drives epithelial damage and fluid secretion

  • Digestibility: Central to reducing intestinal workload

  • Fiber: Supports microbiome and improves stool consistency

  • Probiotics: Enhance microbial balance and recovery

  • Osmotic vs secretory diarrhea: Determines dietary strategy focus

  • Microbiome: Central regulator of digestive health and recovery

  • Early diet intervention: Improves outcomes and reduces drug reliance

Evidence Notes

Strong evidence supports nutritional management as a first-line approach in uncomplicated acute diarrhea.

Emerging evidence highlights the importance of microbiome-targeted interventions.

Limitations include variability in study populations and extrapolation across disease severities.

Additionally, differences in diet formulations, ingredient sources, and study endpoints limit direct comparability across trials.

Many studies focus on short-term outcomes, with limited data on the prevention of recurrence and on long-term gastrointestinal health.

Translational limitations also arise when extrapolating findings from chronic enteropathy or experimental models to acute, self-limiting disease, highlighting the need for condition-specific research.

VetFarmacy Clinical Resource

VetFarmacy publishes downloadable clinical reference guides that translate veterinary nutrition research into practical decision frameworks.

 

The featured resource, the Veterinary Diet Decision Framework for Dogs, explains how veterinarians select diet strategies based on disease mechanisms, including gastrointestinal disease, food allergies, metabolic disorders, kidney disease, and weight management.

 

Subscribers receive access to current and future VetFarmacy clinical guides as they are released.

References

  • Bai, H., Liu, T., Wang, S., Shen, L., & Wang, Z. (2023). Variations in gut microbiome and metabolites of dogs with acute diarrhea in poodles and Labrador retrievers. Archives of Microbiology, 205, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-023-03439-6

  • Candellone, A., Cerquetella, M., Girolami, F., Badino, P., & Odore, R. (2020). Acute diarrhea in dogs: Current management and potential role of dietary polyphenols supplementation. Antioxidants, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080725

  • Cerquetella, M., Rossi, G., Suchodolski, J., Schmitz, S., Allenspach, K., Rodríguez-Franco, F., Furlanello, T., Gavazza, A., Marchegiani, A., Unterer, S., Burgener, I., Pengo, G., & Jergens, A. (2020). Proposal for rational antibacterial use in the diagnosis and treatment of dogs with chronic diarrhoea. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 61, 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13122

  • Chandler, M. (2013). Dietary management of gastrointestinal disease. https://vetfolio.s3.amazonaws.com/91/a5/c04b21ab4ce49721a662f4b4bbc3/clinical-view-40-focus-on-nutrition-dietary-management-of-gastrointestinal-disease.pdf

  • Ellis, C., Odunayo, A., & Tolbert, M. (2023). The use of metronidazole in acute diarrhea in dogs: A narrative review. Topics in Companion Animal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcam.2023.100824

  • Francillon, W., Winston, J., Schreeg, M., Lilly, M., Parker, V., & Rudinsky, A. (2023). Clinician prescribing practices for managing canine idiopathic acute diarrhea are not evidence based. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.23.06.0313

  • Fritsch, D., Jackson, M., Wernimont, S., Feld, G., MacLeay, J., Brejda, J., Cochrane, C., & Gross, K. (2022). Microbiome function underpins the efficacy of a fiber-supplemented dietary intervention in dogs with chronic large bowel diarrhea. BMC Veterinary Research, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03315-3

  • Fritsch, D., Wernimont, S., Jackson, M., MacLeay, J., & Gross, K. (2022). A prospective multicenter study of the efficacy of a fiber-supplemented dietary intervention in dogs with chronic large bowel diarrhea. BMC Veterinary Research, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03302-8

  • Glanemann, B., Seo, Y., Priestnall, S., Garden, O., Kilburn, L., Rossoni-Serão, M., Segarra, S., Mochel, J., & Allenspach, K. (2021). Clinical efficacy of prebiotics and glycosaminoglycans versus placebo in dogs with food responsive enteropathy receiving a hydrolyzed diet: A pilot study. PLoS ONE, 16. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.13.439608

  • Gómez-Gallego, C., Junnila, J., Männikkö, S., Hämeenoja, P., Valtonen, E., Salminen, S., & Beasley, S. (2016). A canine-specific probiotic product in treating acute or intermittent diarrhea in dogs: A double-blind placebo-controlled efficacy study. Veterinary Microbiology, 197, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.11.015

  • Guilford, W. G., & Matz, M. E. (2003). The nutritional management of gastrointestinal tract disorders in companion animals. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 51, 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2003.36382

  • Ing, N., & Steiner, J. (2024). The use of diets in the diagnosis and treatment of common gastrointestinal diseases in dogs and cats. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Vol. 1446, pp. 39–53). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54192-6_3

  • Jensen, A. P., & Bjørnvad, C. R. (2019). Clinical effect of probiotics in prevention or treatment of gastrointestinal disease in dogs: A systematic review. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 33, 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15554

  • Jessen, L., Werner, M., Singleton, D., Prior, C., Foroutan, F., Ferran, A., Arenas, C., Bjørnvad, C., Lavy, E., Allerton, F., Allenspach, K., Guardabassi, L., Unterer, S., Bodnárová, T., Windahl, U., Brennan, M., Weese, J., & Scahill, K. (2024). European Network for Optimization of Veterinary Antimicrobial Therapy (ENOVAT) guidelines for antimicrobial use in canine acute diarrhoea. Veterinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106208

  • Kelley, R. L., Minikhiem, D., Kiely, B., O’Mahony, L., O’Sullivan, D., Boileau, T., & Park, J. S. (2017). Clinical benefits of probiotic canine-derived Bifidobacterium animalis strain AHC7 in dogs with acute idiopathic diarrhea. Veterinary Therapeutics, 10, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-31198

  • Langlois, D., Koenigshof, A., & Mani, R. (2019). Metronidazole treatment of acute diarrhea in dogs: A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 34, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15664

  • Lappin, M. R., Zug, A., Hovenga, C., Gagne, J., & Cross, E. (2022). Efficacy of feeding a diet containing a high concentration of mixed fiber sources for management of acute large bowel diarrhea in dogs in shelters. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 36, 488–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16360

  • Liao, P., Yang, K., Huang, H., Xin, Z., Jian, S., Wen, C., He, S., Zhang, L., & Deng, B. (2023). Abrupt dietary change and gradual dietary transition impact diarrheal symptoms, fecal fermentation characteristics, microbiota, and metabolic profile in healthy puppies. Animals, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081300

  • Morrow, L. (2025). Does feeding a gastrointestinal diet improve the resolution of clinical signs in dogs with acute uncomplicated diarrhoea? Veterinary Record, 196(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.5189

  • Nixon, S. L., Rose, L., & Muller, A. T. (2019). Efficacy of an orally administered anti-diarrheal probiotic paste in dogs with acute diarrhea: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical study. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 33, 1286–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15481

  • O’Neill, D. G., Prisk, L., Brodbelt, D. C., Church, D. B., & Allerton, F. (2025). Epidemiology and clinical management of acute diarrhoea in dogs under primary veterinary care in the UK. PLOS One, 20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324203

  • Pignataro, G., Di Prinzio, R., Crisi, P., Belà, B., Fusaro, I., Trevisan, C., De Acetis, L., & Gramenzi, A. (2021). Comparison of the therapeutic effect of treatment with antibiotics or nutraceuticals on clinical activity and the fecal microbiome of dogs with acute diarrhea. Animals, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061484

  • Rossi, G., Cerquetella, M., Gavazza, A., Galosi, L., Berardi, S., Mangiaterra, S., Mari, S., Suchodolski, J., Lidbury, J., Steiner, J., & Pengo, G. (2020). Rapid resolution of large bowel diarrhea after administration of a high-fiber diet and probiotic mixture in dogs. Veterinary Sciences, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7010021

  • Rudinsky, A. J., Parker, V. J., Winston, J. A., Cooper, E. S., Mathie, T., Howard, J. P., Bremer, C. E., Yaxley, P. E., Marsh, A. E., Laxalde, J. A., Suchodolski, J. S., & Perea, S. C. (2022). Nutritional management is superior to metronidazole for treatment of acute colitis in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.22.08.0349

  • Scahill, K., Jessen, L., Prior, C., Singleton, D., Foroutan, F., Ferran, A., Arenas, C., Bjørnvad, C., Lavy, E., Allerton, F., Weese, J., Allenspach, K., Guardabassi, L., Unterer, S., Bodnárová, T., Windahl, U., Brennan, M., & Werner, M. (2023). Efficacy of antimicrobial and nutraceutical treatment for canine acute diarrhoea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Veterinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.106054

  • Schmitz, S. (2024). Evidence-based use of biotics in the management of gastrointestinal disorders in dogs and cats. Veterinary Record, 195(S2), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.4916

  • Singleton, D. A., Noble, P. J., Sánchez-Vizcaíno, F., Dawson, S., Pinchbeck, G. L., Williams, N. J., Radford, A. D., & Jones, P. H. (2019). Pharmaceutical prescription in canine acute diarrhoea: A longitudinal electronic health record analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00218

  • Socha, P., & Socha, B. (2025). The impact of a multi-strain probiotic supplementation on puppies manifesting diarrhoeic symptoms during the initial seven days of life. Animals, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15121700

  • Volkmann, M., Steiner, J. M., Fosgate, G. T., Zentek, J., Hartmann, S., & Kohn, B. (2017). Chronic diarrhea in dogs: Retrospective study in 136 cases. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 31, 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14739

  • Wg, G. (1994). Nutritional management of gastrointestinal tract diseases of dogs and cats. Journal of Nutrition, 124, 2663S–2669S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/124.suppl_12.2663s

bottom of page