top of page

Postbiotics in Canine Clinical Nutrition: Mechanisms and Evidence

 

VetFarmacy Clinical Evidence Library

Nutritional Domain: Canine Clinical Nutrition

Ingredient Focus: Postbiotics

Author: Dr. Athena Angela Gaffud, DVM

Content Type: Ingredient Master Evidence Page

Evidence Base: Peer-reviewed veterinary studies, in vitro canine microbiome models, mechanistic research, and translational literature on microbiota-derived compounds.

Last Reviewed: 2026

Purpose: A mechanism-driven synthesis of postbiotics in dogs, linking molecular pathways to clinical applications across gastrointestinal, immune, and metabolic systems.

Evidence Transparency

This article integrates canine studies, mechanistic research, and translational data on postbiotics.

​

  • Stronger evidence: Gastrointestinal health, dysbiosis, and inflammatory biomarkers

  • Moderate evidence: Immune modulation, oral health

  • Limited evidence: Dermatologic, metabolic, neurologic, and systemic applications

 

Most effects are supported by mechanistic and emerging clinical data, with limited standardized trials in dogs.

Distinctions are made between:

​

  • Canine clinical evidence

  • Translational findings

  • Mechanistic data

 

This content supports evidence-based interpretation, not individualized medical care.

Introduction

 

Postbiotics for dogs refer to non-viable microbial cells, structural components, and metabolic byproducts generated during microbial fermentation that exert biologically active effects on the host. These include short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), peptidoglycans, lipoteichoic acids, exopolysaccharides, bacteriocins, and microbial-derived metabolites, which interact with host systems through defined signaling pathways.

​

Within the broader frameworks of the Canine Health Hub and the Ingredient Hub, postbiotics represent a mechanistically distinct therapeutic category. Unlike probiotics, their function does not depend on microbial viability, enabling predictable modulation of inflammation, barrier function, and metabolic signaling.

​

Clinically, postbiotics are relevant across:

​

 

These applications are unified by shared mechanisms involving cytokine regulation, signaling pathways, lipid metabolism, and microbiome-derived biomarkers, positioning postbiotics as a central node in microbiome-targeted canine nutrition.

​

Biochemistry and Active Components

 

Postbiotics encompass a heterogeneous group of bioactive compounds derived from microbial metabolism or structural cellular components.

​

Core Molecular Classes

​

  • Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs): butyrate, acetate, propionate

  • Cell wall fragments: peptidoglycans, lipoteichoic acids

  • Microbial metabolites: indoles, organic acids, secondary bile acids

  • Bioactive peptides and enzymes

  • Exopolysaccharides and bacteriocins

 

Beyond SCFAs, postbiotics include indole derivatives that regulate aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) signaling, influencing mucosal immunity and epithelial repair. Bacteriocins contribute to the modulation of the microbial ecosystem by selectively inhibiting pathogenic species.

​

At the epigenetic level, butyrate functions as a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, altering gene expression related to inflammation, oxidative stress, and epithelial integrity.

​

These biochemical properties enable postbiotics to deliver direct functional signaling molecules, bypassing variability associated with microbial survival (Zhao et al., 2024; Scott et al., 2022).

​

Absorption, Transport, and Metabolism

​

  • SCFAs are absorbed via monocarboxylate transporters (MCT1)

  • Butyrate is metabolized by colonocytes as a primary energy source

  • Acetate and propionate influence hepatic lipid metabolism and gluconeogenesis

​​

Microbial structural components interact with Toll-like receptors (TLRs), initiating downstream immune signaling cascades.

Beyond receptor binding, postbiotic compounds exert effects through metabolite–host co-regulation networks, integrating microbial signals into host metabolic and immune pathways. SCFAs, particularly butyrate and propionate, function as ligands for G-protein coupled receptors (GPR41, GPR43, and GPR109A), which regulate inflammatory responses, energy metabolism, and epithelial homeostasis.

​

Butyrate’s role as an HDAC inhibitor extends to the modulation of gene clusters involved in oxidative stress resistance, mitochondrial biogenesis, and epithelial differentiation, directly influencing intestinal resilience. In parallel, acetate contributes to systemic metabolic signaling by entering peripheral circulation and participating in cholesterol synthesis and lipid metabolism pathways within the liver.

​

Postbiotic-derived secondary metabolites also interact with bile acid signaling pathways (FXR and TGR5 receptors), influencing lipid digestion, glucose homeostasis, and inflammatory tone. These interactions demonstrate that postbiotics function not only as local gut modulators but also as systemic metabolic regulators.

​

Collectively, these biochemical mechanisms position postbiotics as multi-target signaling mediators that bridge microbiome activity with host physiology, rather than as isolated gut-specific agents (Zhao et al., 2024; Hijová, 2024).

​

Mechanisms of Action

 

Postbiotics exert biological effects through integrated signaling networks across immune, epithelial, and metabolic systems.

​

Anti-inflammatory Pathways

 

Postbiotics modulate inflammation via cytokine regulation and transcriptional control:

​

  • ↓ TNF-α, IL-6 (pro-inflammatory cytokines)

  • ↑ IL-10 (anti-inflammatory cytokine)

  • Inhibition of NF-κB signaling pathways

 

Butyrate suppresses NF-κB activation through HDAC inhibition, reducing transcription of inflammatory mediators.

Clinical relevance: modulation of inflammation in chronic enteropathy and systemic inflammatory states.


Evidence: canine biomarker modulation demonstrated in feeding trials (Kayser et al., 2024).

​

Metabolic Effects

 

Postbiotics influence lipid metabolism, glucose regulation, and energy homeostasis:

​

  • Activation of GPR41 and GPR43 receptors

  • Modulation of AMPK signaling pathways

  • Regulation of hepatic lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity

 

SCFAs serve as both signaling molecules and metabolic substrates, linking microbiome activity to systemic energy balance.

​

Cellular Signaling

 

Postbiotics interact with host cells through:

​

  • TLR-mediated signaling pathways

  • MAPK cascade activation

  • Regulation of tight junction proteins (occludin, claudins)

 

These pathways maintain intestinal barrier integrity and regulate immune surveillance.

​

Barrier Function and Microbiome Ecology

 

Postbiotics enhance barrier integrity through:

​

  • Mucin production via goblet cell activation

  • Reinforcement of epithelial turnover

  • Reduction of intestinal permeability (zonulin modulation)

 

They also support microbiome stability via metabolite cross-feeding, promoting functional redundancy and resilience.

These effects occur independently of microbial colonization, ensuring consistent activity even under dysbiosis or antibiotic exposure (Wilson & Swanson, 2024; Pilla & Suchodolski, 2020).

​

Postbiotics also influence the gut–brain–immune axis, a bidirectional communication network involving microbial metabolites, neural signaling, and immune modulation. SCFAs can cross the blood–brain barrier and influence neurotransmitter synthesis, neuroinflammation, and hypothalamic regulation of energy balance.

​

From a clinical monitoring perspective, postbiotic activity is reflected in measurable biomarkers, including:

​

  • Reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) and pro-inflammatory cytokines

  • Decreased fecal calprotectin, indicating reduced intestinal inflammation

  • Modulation of zonulin, reflecting improved intestinal permeability

  • Altered SCFA profiles in fecal metabolomics

 

These biomarkers provide objective endpoints for evaluating postbiotic efficacy in clinical settings.

​

Beyond isolated pathway effects, postbiotics operate within an integrated immunometabolic network in which immune signaling, energy metabolism, and microbial activity converge. This interaction is particularly evident in the regulation of low-grade chronic inflammation, a common feature across gastrointestinal, metabolic, and dermatologic conditions.

​

SCFAs modulate the differentiation and function of regulatory T cells (Tregs), which play a central role in maintaining immune tolerance and preventing excessive inflammatory responses. Butyrate enhances Treg development by epigenetically modulating the FOXP3 gene, thereby reinforcing anti-inflammatory immune phenotypes.

​

Simultaneously, postbiotics influence macrophage polarization, shifting immune responses from pro-inflammatory M1 phenotypes toward anti-inflammatory M2 phenotypes. This transition reduces tissue damage and supports repair processes across multiple organ systems.

​

From a metabolic perspective, these immune effects are tightly linked to energy-sensing pathways, including AMPK and mTOR signaling. By influencing these pathways, postbiotics regulate cellular energy balance, mitochondrial efficiency, and inflammatory signaling simultaneously.

​

This dual regulation of immune and metabolic pathways explains why postbiotics demonstrate cross-system effects, including:

​

  • Reduced intestinal inflammation

  • Improved metabolic biomarkers

  • Modulation of systemic immune responses

 

These findings support the concept that postbiotics function as systems-level regulators, rather than isolated gut-targeted compounds (Zdybel et al., 2025; Sabahi et al., 2022).

​

Furthermore, postbiotics modulate oxidative stress pathways, reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and enhancing antioxidant defenses. This contributes to protection against chronic inflammatory conditions and tissue damage.

The integration of immune signaling, metabolic regulation, and biomarker modulation underscores the systems-level impact of postbiotics in canine health (Scott et al., 2022; Da et al., 2024).

​

Organ and System-Level Effects

​

Gastrointestinal System

​

  • Improved epithelial integrity

  • Reduced inflammation

  • Microbiome modulation

​​

→ See gastrointestinal system hub

​

Immune System

​

  • Cytokine balance

  • Regulation of GALT

​​

Metabolic System

​

  • Hepatic metabolism

  • Systemic inflammatory biomarker modulation

​​

Evidence context: Mechanistic interpretation should be evaluated alongside limitations of veterinary clinical trials and the broader Evidence Library.

​

Clinical Applications Across Conditions

​

Chronic Enteropathy / Inflammatory Bowel Disease

 

Mechanism: NF-κB inhibition, cytokine modulation, and tight junction stabilization.

Evidence: A meta-analysis demonstrates improved microbiome and GI biomarker profiles (Bonel-Ayuso et al., 2025). In vitro canine models confirm the restoration of the microbiota (Deschamps et al., 2025).

Clinical Interpretation: Adjunctive therapy targeting inflammation and dysbiosis.

Evidence Strength: Moderate–strong

​

Acute Diarrhea

 

Mechanism: Rapid modulation of microbiota and inflammatory signaling.

Evidence: Meta-analysis supports microbiome-targeted interventions (Scahill et al., 2023).

Clinical Interpretation: Short-term adjunct to reduce severity and duration.

Evidence Strength: Moderate

​

Antibiotic-Associated Dysbiosis

 

Mechanism: Direct replacement of microbial metabolites and restoration of functional microbiome output.

Evidence: In vitro canine gut models show microbiome recovery (Deschamps et al., 2025).

Clinical Interpretation: Useful during or after antibiotic therapy.

Evidence Strength: Moderate

​

Dermatologic Disease (Atopic Dermatitis)

 

Mechanism: Gut–skin axis modulation via cytokines and immune signaling pathways; influence on lipid metabolism in the skin barrier.

Evidence: Translational studies support immunomodulatory effects (Hosseini et al., 2023).

Clinical Interpretation: Adjunctive role in inflammatory skin disease with GI involvement.

Evidence Strength: Limited–moderate

​

Immune-Mediated Inflammation

 

Mechanism: TLR signaling and cytokine regulation.

Evidence: Canine feeding trials show biomarker modulation (Kayser et al., 2024).

Clinical Interpretation: Supports systemic regulation of inflammation.

Evidence Strength: Moderate

​

Metabolic Dysfunction and Obesity

 

Mechanism: SCFA-mediated effects on lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity.

Evidence: Translational meta-analysis demonstrates metabolic improvements (Nazarinejad et al., 2025).

Clinical Interpretation: Adjunct in weight management strategies (see weight management interventions in dogs).

Evidence Strength: Limited–moderate

​

Cognitive Function and Neuroinflammation

 

Mechanism: Postbiotics influence the gut–brain axis through SCFA-mediated signaling, modulation of neuroinflammatory cytokines, and regulation of neurotransmitter precursors. Butyrate has been shown to modulate microglial activation and neuroinflammatory signaling pathways, thereby reducing chronic, low-grade inflammation in neural tissues.

Evidence: While canine-specific data remain limited, translational studies demonstrate that postbiotic metabolites influence neuroinflammation and cognitive function, particularly through epigenetic and immune-mediated pathways (Gurunathan et al., 2023).

Clinical Interpretation: Potential adjunctive role in age-related cognitive decline and neuroinflammatory conditions, particularly in senior dogs.

Evidence Strength: Limited (translational)

​

Musculoskeletal Health and Joint Disease

 

Mechanism: Postbiotics modulate inflammatory signaling pathways associated with joint degeneration, including cytokine-mediated cartilage breakdown and oxidative stress. SCFAs contribute to systemic anti-inflammatory effects, while microbial metabolites influence bone and muscle metabolism.

Evidence: Emerging research suggests that postbiotics may support bone density, muscle metabolism, and inflammatory regulation in the musculoskeletal system (Idrisa et al., 2025).

Clinical Interpretation: Adjunctive support in osteoarthritis and age-related mobility decline, particularly when combined with weight management and anti-inflammatory nutrition strategies.

Evidence Strength: Limited (emerging evidence)

​

Cellular Protection and Adjunctive Oncology Support

 

Mechanism: Postbiotics influence cellular homeostasis through anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and epigenetic mechanisms. SCFAs, such as butyrate, regulate gene expression via HDAC inhibition, promoting controlled cell proliferation and apoptosis while reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling pathways associated with tumor progression. Microbial metabolites also modulate immune surveillance, enhancing immune cells' ability to recognize and respond to abnormal cellular activity. Additionally, postbiotics influence gut barrier integrity, reducing systemic exposure to pro-inflammatory endotoxins that may contribute to chronic disease states.

Evidence: Translational and emerging clinical research suggests postbiotics may support anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative pathways, with potential adjunctive roles in oncology and chronic disease management (Balendra et al., 2024; Gurunathan et al., 2023).

Clinical Interpretation: Postbiotics may be considered as adjunctive support in chronic inflammatory and neoplastic conditions, particularly where immune dysregulation and oxidative stress are contributing factors.

Evidence Strength: Limited (translational and emerging)

​

Oral Health and Halitosis

 

Mechanism: Microbiome modulation and reduction of volatile sulfur compounds.

Evidence: Clinical improvement demonstrated in dogs (Sordillo et al., 2025).

Clinical Interpretation: Targeted application in oral dysbiosis.

Evidence Strength: Moderate

​

Pancreatitis

 

Mechanism: Indirect modulation of inflammation and lipid metabolism.

Evidence: Dietary fat and canine pancreatitis

Clinical Interpretation: Supportive, not primary therapy.

Evidence Strength: Limited

​

Dosage and Clinical Use

 

Postbiotic dosing differs fundamentally from probiotic administration, as efficacy is determined by the concentration of bioactive compounds rather than by viable organism counts.

​

Therapeutic vs Maintenance Use

 

  • Therapeutic application: Higher concentrations targeting inflammatory, dysbiotic, or metabolic conditions

  • Maintenance application: Lower concentrations aimed at microbiome stability and prevention

​​

Determinants of Effective Dosing

 

Clinical response is influenced by:

​

  • Metabolite concentration: SCFA levels, peptide activity, and microbial-derived compounds

  • Source strain and fermentation conditions: which determine metabolite composition

  • Delivery matrix: encapsulation, diet inclusion, or extract form

  • Target site of action: colon vs systemic circulation

 

Unlike probiotics, postbiotics provide consistent dosing independent of gastrointestinal survival, making them particularly useful in conditions where microbiota viability is compromised.

​

Bioavailability Considerations

 

  • SCFAs are rapidly absorbed and utilized locally or systemically

  • Heat-stable compounds maintain activity across storage and digestion

  • Matrix composition influences release kinetics and absorption

​​

Clinical Implication

 

The absence of standardized dosing guidelines remains a limitation; however, evidence suggests that clinical effects correlate with metabolite exposure levels, particularly in relation to inflammatory biomarkers and microbiome modulation (Wei et al., 2024; Kumar et al., 2024).

​

Safety and Limitations

 

Postbiotics demonstrate a favorable safety profile, but limitations remain.

​

Key Limitations

 

  • Lack of standardization

  • Variability in formulation

  • Limited long-term canine trials

​​

Definitions vary across studies, complicating comparison (Å»óÅ‚kiewicz et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2024).

​

An additional limitation lies in the complexity of postbiotic composition, as multiple bioactive compounds may act synergistically or independently. This makes it difficult to attribute clinical outcomes to specific components, complicating both research interpretation and clinical application.

​

Furthermore, regulatory frameworks for postbiotics remain underdeveloped, with inconsistent classification across nutritional and pharmaceutical domains. This variability affects quality control, labeling, and clinical standardization.

​

Another critical consideration is inter-individual variability in host response, influenced by baseline microbiome composition, diet, genetics, and disease state. As demonstrated in microbiome research, dogs exhibit individualized responses to dietary interventions, which may extend to postbiotic efficacy.

​

These factors highlight the need for precision nutrition approaches, where postbiotic use is tailored to individual patient profiles rather than applied uniformly across populations (Tanprasertsuk et al., 2021; Wilson & Swanson, 2024).

​

Evidence Summary

 

The evidence supporting postbiotics in canine clinical nutrition is best understood as a convergent model, drawing on mechanistic, translational, and emerging clinical data.

​

Mechanistic Evidence (Strong)

 

Extensive research demonstrates that postbiotics influence:

​

  • Cytokine signaling and inflammatory pathways

  • Intestinal barrier integrity and epithelial turnover

  • Lipid metabolism and energy regulation

  • Microbiome-derived biomarker profiles

​​

These mechanisms are consistently supported across in vitro, animal, and translational studies.

​

Clinical Evidence in Dogs (Moderate)

 

Canine-specific studies demonstrate:

​

  • Modulation of inflammatory biomarkers

  • Improvement in gastrointestinal function

  • Restoration of microbiome balance following dysbiosis

 

Systematic reviews confirm beneficial trends but emphasize variability in study design and formulation (Bonel-Ayuso et al., 2025).

​

Translational Evidence (Limited–Moderate)

 

Applications in metabolic disease, dermatologic conditions, and systemic inflammation are supported primarily by non-canine models, requiring cautious interpretation.

​

Overall Interpretation

 

Postbiotics represent a high-potential, mechanism-driven intervention with:

​

  • Strong biological plausibility

  • Moderate clinical validation in canine populations

  • Expanding research across multiple systems

 

Clinical adoption should therefore prioritize conditions with established mechanistic alignment, while recognizing current limitations in standardized clinical evidence.

​

Practical Clinical Integration

 

Postbiotics should be implemented within a mechanism-driven clinical nutrition framework, rather than as isolated supplements.

​

Clinical Use Cases

 

  • Dysbiosis-associated gastrointestinal disease: restoration of microbial metabolic output

  • Chronic enteropathy: modulation of inflammatory signaling pathways

  • Antibiotic recovery: replacement of lost microbial metabolites

  • Immune dysregulation: cytokine balancing and immune signaling modulation

  • Metabolic disorders: SCFA-mediated regulation of lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity

​​

Decision Context

 

Clinical decision-making should consider:

​

  • Primary affected system (gastrointestinal, immune, metabolic)

  • Dominant pathological mechanism (inflammation, barrier dysfunction, dysbiosis)

  • Interaction with existing diet composition

  • Patient-specific factors (age, disease severity, comorbidities)

​​

Nutrient Interactions

 

Postbiotics demonstrate functional synergy with:

​

  • Prebiotics (fiber): substrate provision for endogenous metabolite production

  • Dietary fat composition: influences inflammatory tone and lipid metabolism

  • Protein sources: modulate microbiome composition and fermentation profiles

​​

These interactions highlight the importance of integrating postbiotics into complete dietary strategies, not standalone interventions.

​

Related Conditions

​

  • Chronic enteropathy

  • Acute diarrhea

  • Dysbiosis

  • Pancreatitis

  • Atopic dermatitis

  • Obesity

 

Cross-system relevance: gut–immune–metabolic axis

​

Evidence Notes

 

The current evidence base for postbiotics reflects a tiered structure of scientific support:

​

  • Strong evidence: Mechanistic pathways involving SCFAs, cytokine modulation, and epithelial integrity

  • Moderate evidence: Canine clinical and in vitro studies demonstrating microbiome and biomarker effects

  • Limited evidence: Systemic applications (neurologic, metabolic, dermatologic) primarily derived from translational models.

​

Key limitations include:

​

  • Heterogeneity in postbiotic definitions and formulations

  • Limited standardization of dosing and active compound quantification

  • Reliance on extrapolation from human and rodent studies

​​

Interpretation must therefore integrate insights from translating human nutrition studies to pets and acknowledge constraints outlined in the limitations of veterinary clinical trials.

 

Despite these limitations, convergence of mechanistic and early clinical data supports postbiotics as a high-potential intervention in microbiome-targeted veterinary nutrition.

knowledge of their molecular mechanisms—it requires applying those mechanisms within a structured clinical framework.

​

The VetFarmacy Veterinary Diet Decision Framework for Dogs provides a system-based approach used to:

​

  • Identify the primary organ system affected

  • Match nutritional strategies to disease mechanisms such as inflammation, microbiome disruption, and metabolic dysfunction

  • Integrate functional ingredients like postbiotics into broader therapeutic diet plans

 

As outlined in the framework, veterinarians align diet selection with physiological pathways, including immune regulation, gut barrier function, and lipid metabolism across conditions such as gastrointestinal disease, allergies, obesity, kidney disease, and joint disorders.

​

​

​

 

This resource bridges the gap between microbiome science and clinical decision-making, helping translate postbiotic mechanisms into structured nutritional strategies.

References

​

  • Balendra, V., Rosenfeld, R., Amoroso, C., Castagnone, C., Rossino, M., Garrone, O., & Ghidini, M. (2024). Postbiotics as adjuvant therapy in cancer care. Nutrients, 16(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152400

  • Bonel-Ayuso, D., Pineda-Pampliega, J., García, P., Fernández-Muela, M., De La Fuente, J., Fernandez, P., & Redondo, B. (2025). Effects of postbiotic administration on canine health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microorganisms, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071572

  • Da, M., Sun, J., Li, D., Dong, L., Wang, L., & Chen, F. (2024). Postbiotics: Enhancing human health with a novel concept. eFood. https://doi.org/10.1002/efd2.180

  • Deschamps, C., Humbert, D., Brun, M., Denis, S., Durif, C., Apper, E., & Blanquet-Diot, S. (2025). Lactobacillus helveticus-derived postbiotic and live Saccharomyces boulardii restore gut microbiota after antibiotic disturbance in an in vitro canine gut model. Beneficial Microbes. https://doi.org/10.1163/18762891-bja00088

  • Gurunathan, S., Thangaraj, P., & Kim, J. (2023). Postbiotics: Functional food materials and therapeutic agents for cancer, diabetes, and inflammatory diseases. Foods, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13010089

  • Hijová, E. (2024). Postbiotics as metabolites and their biotherapeutic potential. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105441

  • Hosseini, S., Farhangfar, A., Moradi, M., & Dalir-Naghadeh, B. (2023). Beyond probiotics: Exploring the potential of postbiotics and parabiotics in veterinary medicine. Research in Veterinary Science, 167, 105133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2023.105133

  • Idrisa, K., Gato, E., & Agossou, J. (2025). Postbiotics and musculoskeletal health: Emerging applications in bone, muscle, and joint care. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0525.2025

  • Kayser, E., He, F., Nixon, S., Howard-Varona, A., Lamelas, A., Martínez-Blanch, J., Chenoll, E., Davenport, G., & De Godoy, M. (2024). Effects of supplementation of live and heat-treated Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145 on glycemic and insulinemic response, fecal microbiota, systemic biomarkers of inflammation, and white blood cell gene expression of adult dogs. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae291

  • Kumar, A., Green, K., & Rawat, M. (2024). A comprehensive overview of postbiotics with a special focus on discovery techniques and clinical applications. Foods, 13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13182937

  • Nazarinejad, Z., Molani-Gol, R., Nasiraie, L., & Ebrahimzadeh-Attari, V. (2025). Postbiotics as a novel intervention for obesity management and improving metabolic parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies. Journal of Translational Medicine, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06927-z

  • Pilla, R., & Suchodolski, J. (2020). The role of the canine gut microbiome and metabolome in health and gastrointestinal disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00498

  • Sabahi, S., Homayouni-Rad, A., Aghebati-Maleki, L., Sangtarash, N., Ozma, M., Karimi, A., Hosseini, H., & Abbasi, A. (2022). Postbiotics as the new frontier in food and pharmaceutical research. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 63, 8375–8402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2056727

  • Scahill, K., Jessen, L., Prior, C., Singleton, D., Foroutan, F., Ferran, A., Arenas, C., Bjørnvad, C., Lavy, E., Allerton, F., Weese, J., Allenspach, K., Guardabassi, L., Unterer, S., Bodnárová, T., Windahl, U., Brennan, M., & Werner, M. (2023). Efficacy of antimicrobial and nutraceutical treatment for canine acute diarrhoea: A systematic review and meta-analysis for ENOVAT guidelines. Veterinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2023.106054

  • Scott, E., De Paepe, K., & Van De Wiele, T. (2022). Postbiotics and their health modulatory biomolecules. Biomolecules, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111640

  • Sordillo, A., Casella, L., Turcotte, R., & Sheth, R. (2025). A novel postbiotic reduces canine halitosis. Animals, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15111596

  • Tanprasertsuk, J., Jha, A., Shmalberg, J., Jones, R., Perry, L., Maughan, H., & Honaker, R. (2021). The microbiota of healthy dogs demonstrates individualized responses to synbiotic supplementation in a randomized controlled trial. Animal Microbiome, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-021-00098-0

  • Wei, L., Wang, B., Bai, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, C., Suo, H., & Wang, C. (2024). Postbiotics are a candidate for new functional foods. Food Chemistry: X, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101650

  • Wilson, S., & Swanson, K. (2024). The influence of ‘biotics’ on the gut microbiome of dogs and cats. Veterinary Record, 195(S2), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.4914

  • Zdybel, K., Åšliwka, A., Polak-Berecka, M., Polak, P., & WaÅ›ko, A. (2025). Postbiotics formulation and therapeutic effect in inflammation: A systematic review. Nutrients, 17(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17132187

  • Zhao, X., Liu, S., Li, S., Jiang, W., Wang, J., Xiao, J., Chen, T., Khan, M., Wang, W., Li, M., Li, S., & Cao, Z. (2024). Unlocking the power of postbiotics: A revolutionary approach to nutrition for humans and animals. Cell Metabolism, 36(4), 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2024.03.004

  • Å»óÅ‚kiewicz, J., Marzec, A., RuszczyÅ„ski, M., & Feleszko, W. (2020). Postbiotics—A step beyond pre- and probiotics. Nutrients, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082189

bottom of page