top of page

Probiotics in Canine Clinical Nutrition: Mechanisms and Evidence

 

VetFarmacy Clinical Evidence Library

Nutritional Domain: Canine Clinical Nutrition

Ingredient Focus: Probiotics (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Pediococcus)

Author: Dr. Athena Angela Gaffud, DVM

Content Type: Ingredient Master Evidence Page

Evidence Base: Peer-reviewed veterinary clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, microbiome sequencing studies, mechanistic research, and translational human literature

Last Reviewed: 2026

Purpose: This page provides a comprehensive, mechanism-driven synthesis of current veterinary and translational evidence on probiotics for dogs. It integrates microbiome biology, signaling pathways, immune modulation, and clinical outcomes to support evidence-based nutritional decision-making in canine health.

Evidence Transparency

This article synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed veterinary clinical trials, microbiome studies, mechanistic cellular research, and translational human literature evaluating probiotics in canine health.

 

While strong evidence supports probiotic use in conditions such as acute diarrhea and chronic enteropathy, other applications—including dermatologic disease and metabolic modulation—are supported by a combination of controlled trials, microbiome analyses, and mechanistic data.

 

Direct randomized controlled trials in dogs remain limited for certain conditions, and outcomes are influenced by strain specificity, dosing variability, and individual differences in microbiome composition.

 

Where applicable, distinctions are made between:

  • Established clinical evidence in dogs

  • Moderate evidence from controlled or observational studies

  • Mechanistic and preclinical findings

  • Translational evidence from human research

 

This content is intended for educational interpretation of veterinary nutrition science and does not replace individualized veterinary medical care.

Introduction

 

Probiotics are defined as live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host. In canine clinical nutrition, probiotics function as biologically active modulators of the gut microbiome, influencing host physiology through microbial metabolites, immune signaling, and epithelial interactions.

Within the broader framework of canine health and the ingredient hub, probiotics occupy a central role due to their capacity to influence multiple organ systems via the gut–immune–metabolic axis. Their clinical relevance extends beyond gastrointestinal health to include dermatologic, metabolic, and systemic immune conditions.

Probiotics should not be conceptualized as static microbial additions, but rather as dynamic regulators of host–microbiome ecosystems. Their effects are mediated through signaling pathways, metabolite production, and immune calibration, rather than simple colonization.

In canine patients, dysbiosis represents a functional disturbance of microbial ecology, characterized by altered composition, reduced diversity, and disrupted metabolic output. These changes are increasingly evaluated using biomarkers, including fecal short-chain fatty acid profiles, microbial gene expression, and inflammatory mediators such as calprotectin.

Clinically, probiotics have been investigated across:

  • Acute and chronic gastrointestinal disease

  • Antibiotic-associated dysbiosis

  • Atopic dermatitis (gut–skin axis)

  • Obesity and metabolic dysfunction

  • Immune modulation

 

This page consolidates mechanisms → signaling pathways → clinical outcomes, establishing probiotics as a systems-level intervention within canine clinical nutrition.

Biochemistry and Active Components

 

Probiotics used in canine nutrition primarily include lactic acid bacteria and related genera, such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus. These microorganisms exert biological activity through structural and metabolic components rather than systemic absorption.

Strain-Specific Functional Variability

 

Probiotic effects are strain-dependent rather than species-dependent, with distinct functional profiles observed even within the same genus.

For example:

  • Lactobacillus strains differ in adhesion capacity, SCFA production, and immune modulation

  • Bifidobacterium animalis strains demonstrate variable effects on lipid metabolism and immune signaling

  • Enterococcus faecium strains exhibit differences in antimicrobial peptide production and pathogen inhibition

 

This variability is clinically relevant because not all probiotic formulations produce equivalent outcomes, even when taxonomically similar.

Functional characterization studies in dogs demonstrate that strain selection influences:

Structural and Functional Components

 

Key active elements include:

  • Cell wall components: Peptidoglycans and lipoteichoic acids interact with host immune receptors (e.g., Toll-like receptors), initiating intracellular signaling pathways.

  • Adhesion molecules: Facilitate interactions with intestinal epithelial cells, thereby modulating mucosal immunity.

  • Bacteriocins and antimicrobial peptides: Contribute to microbial competition and pathogen suppression.

Microbial Metabolites as Functional Effectors

 

The primary functional output of probiotics is metabolite production, which serves as the interface between the microbiota and host physiology.

  • Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs: butyrate, acetate, propionate)

    • Serve as energy substrates for colonocytes

    • Regulate epithelial integrity

    • Suppress inflammation via histone deacetylase inhibition

    • Activate G-protein coupled receptors involved in energy regulation

  • Secondary bile acids

    • Modulate lipid metabolism

    • Activate nuclear receptors (FXR, TGR5) influencing systemic metabolic signaling

  • Tryptophan metabolites (indoles)

    • Influence mucosal immunity and epithelial signaling

 

These metabolites act as biochemical mediators of signaling pathways, linking microbial activity to host-level responses including cytokine production, inflammation, and metabolic regulation.

Postbiotics and Functional Derivatives

 

The clinical effects of probiotics are increasingly attributed to postbiotics, defined as bioactive compounds produced by microbial activity.

These include:

  • SCFAs

  • Cell wall fragments

  • Enzymes

  • Peptides

 

Emerging evidence suggests that postbiotics may retain many of the beneficial effects of live probiotics while offering improved stability and safety profiles
(Bonel-Ayuso et al., 2025).

This distinction reinforces that probiotic efficacy is mediated through functional outputs rather than microbial viability alone.

Microbiome Ecology and Community Dynamics

 

Probiotics function within a complex microbial ecosystem, where their effects depend on interactions with existing microbiota rather than isolated activity.

Key ecological mechanisms include:

  • Competitive exclusion: Inhibition of pathogenic organisms through nutrient competition and antimicrobial production

  • Cross-feeding interactions: Metabolic cooperation between microbial species enhances SCFA production

  • Community restructuring: Probiotics shift microbial composition toward beneficial taxa, improving functional stability

 

Metagenomic studies in dogs demonstrate that probiotic supplementation alters both microbial diversity and metabolic pathway expression, particularly in dysbiotic states.
(Xu et al., 2019; Wernimont et al., 2020).

Absorption, Transport, and Host Interaction

 

Probiotics do not function through systemic absorption. Instead, their effects are mediated locally through:

  • Interaction with the intestinal epithelium

  • Modulation of luminal microbial communities

  • Activation of host signaling pathways via metabolite diffusion

 

These interactions result in downstream effects on:

  • Immune system regulation

  • Lipid metabolism

  • Barrier function

  • Systemic inflammatory tone

Host–Microbiome Signaling Integration

 

The interaction between probiotics and the host is best understood as a bidirectional signaling network, in which microbial metabolites function as molecular messengers that influence host physiology.

Key signaling pathways involved include:

  • G-protein coupled receptor signaling (GPR41, GPR43, GPR109A)
    Activated by SCFAs, these receptors regulate:

    • Energy homeostasis

    • Immune cell activity

    • Inflammatory tone

  • Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathways
    Recognition of microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) modulates:

    • Innate immune activation

    • Cytokine production

    • Barrier defense mechanisms

  • NF-κB and MAPK signaling cascades
    Central regulators of inflammation, these pathways are directly influenced by probiotic-derived metabolites and structural components

Through these pathways, probiotics exert systemic effects despite remaining localized within the gastrointestinal tract. This highlights their role as functional regulators of host signaling rather than passive microbial supplements.

Mechanisms of Action

 

Anti-inflammatory Pathways

 

Probiotics exert anti-inflammatory effects by modulating cytokine production and suppressing pro-inflammatory signaling pathways.

 

Key mechanisms include:

  • Inhibition of NF-κB signaling: Reduces transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6)

  • Upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines: Including IL-10 and TGF-β

  • Induction of regulatory T cells (Tregs): Promotes immune tolerance

 

These effects are central to the control of chronic inflammation in gastrointestinal and systemic diseases (Schmitz & Suchodolski, 2016).

Cytokine Network Modulation and Immune Reprogramming

 

Probiotics influence both innate and adaptive immunity through cytokine network modulation:

  • Downregulation of pro-inflammatory mediators

  • Enhancement of anti-inflammatory signaling

  • Modulation of dendritic cell function and antigen presentation

 

This results in immune reprogramming, particularly within the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), contributing to improved immune balance in conditions characterized by dysregulation.

Metabolic Effects

 

Probiotics influence host metabolism through microbiome–host metabolic crosstalk:

  • SCFA-mediated signaling (GPR41/43 activation): Regulates appetite, energy expenditure, and glucose metabolism

  • Bile acid transformation: Alters lipid metabolism and hepatic signaling

  • Modulation of adipokines and insulin sensitivity

In obese dogs, probiotic supplementation has been associated with improved energy metabolism and weight regulation (Kang et al., 2024).

Microbiome–Metabolism Interface

 

The gut microbiome functions as a metabolic organ, and probiotics alter this system by:

  • Increasing fermentation efficiency

  • Modifying caloric extraction from nutrients

  • Influencing systemic metabolic signaling

These mechanisms link probiotics directly to metabolic disease pathways, including obesity and low-grade inflammation.

Cellular Signaling

 

At the cellular level, probiotics interact with host cells through:

  • Pattern recognition receptors (TLRs, NOD receptors)

  • MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways

  • Epigenetic modulation via microbial metabolites

These interactions regulate:

  • Cytokine expression

  • Immune cell differentiation

  • Epithelial turnover

Epithelial Barrier Integrity and Tight Junction Regulation

 

Probiotics enhance intestinal barrier function, a critical determinant of systemic inflammation.

They influence:

  • Tight junction proteins (occludin, claudin, zonula occludens)

  • Mucin production

  • Epithelial regeneration

 

Barrier disruption leads to increased permeability and systemic immune activation. Probiotics reduce this risk by reinforcing epithelial integrity and limiting the translocation of antigens.

Organ and System-Level Effects

 

Gastrointestinal system

  • Restoration of microbial diversity

  • Improved nutrient absorption

  • Reduced pathogen colonization

For more information, check the gastrointestinal system hub.

Immune system

  • Cytokine modulation

  • Enhanced mucosal immunity

Metabolic system

  • Regulation of lipid metabolism

  • Interaction with the gut–liver axis

Gut–Organ Axis Integration

 

The influence of probiotics extends beyond the gastrointestinal tract through interconnected gut–organ axes, which mediate systemic physiological effects.

  • Gut–skin axis: Links intestinal microbiota with dermatologic inflammation via cytokine signaling and microbial metabolites

  • Gut–liver axis: Microbial metabolites influence hepatic lipid metabolism, bile acid recycling, and inflammatory signaling

  • Gut–brain axis: Emerging evidence suggests microbial modulation of neuroactive compounds, potentially influencing stress responses and behavior

These interconnected systems reinforce the notion that probiotic effects are system-wide rather than organ-specific, supporting their role in modulating multi-system disease.

Evidence Integration

Clinical Applications Across Conditions

 

Acute Diarrhea

 

Mechanism: Rapid modulation of dysbiosis, inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, and reduction of inflammatory cytokines.

Evidence: Strong evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrates reduced duration and severity of diarrhea (Kelley et al., 2017).

Clinical Interpretation: Probiotics are effective as adjunctive therapy, particularly in acute, uncomplicated cases.

Chronic Enteropathy / Inflammatory Bowel Disease

 

Mechanism: Suppression of NF-κB signaling, restoration of microbial balance, and SCFA-mediated epithelial repair.

Evidence: RCTs demonstrate improved mucosal microbiota and reduced inflammation (White et al., 2017).

At the molecular level, probiotic intervention in inflammatory bowel disease influences:

  • NF-κB pathway suppression

  • Restoration of epithelial tight junction integrity

  • Increased SCFA-mediated epithelial repair

Recent strain-combination studies demonstrate that targeted probiotic therapy can reduce inflammatory biomarkers and improve clinical indices in canine IBD (Zhang et al., 2025).

Clinical Interpretation: Moderate-to-strong evidence supports use as an adjunctive therapy, not as a standalone treatment.

Antibiotic-Associated Dysbiosis

 

Mechanism: Restoration of microbial diversity and prevention of opportunistic overgrowth.

Evidence: Systematic reviews support probiotic use in maintaining microbiome stability
(Jensen & Bjørnvad, 2019).

Clinical Interpretation: Best used during and after antibiotic therapy.

Subclinical Dysbiosis and Functional GI Disturbance

 

Mechanism: Normalization of microbial metabolic output and cytokine balance.

Evidence: Moderate evidence from microbiome and metabolome studies (Pilla & Suchodolski, 2020).

Clinical Interpretation: Applicable in dogs with chronic intermittent GI signs without a clear diagnosis.

 

At a functional level, subclinical dysbiosis is increasingly associated with low-grade inflammation and altered metabolic signaling, even in the absence of overt clinical disease.

This state may manifest as:

  • Variable stool quality

  • Reduced nutrient utilization

  • Subtle immune dysregulation

 

Probiotic intervention in these cases targets early-stage microbiome instability, potentially preventing progression to clinically significant gastrointestinal disease.

Atopic Dermatitis (Gut–Skin Axis)

 

Mechanism: Systemic cytokine modulation and metabolite-mediated immune signaling linking gut and skin.

Evidence: Meta-analyses show improvement in pruritus and inflammatory markers (Pacheco et al., 2025).

Clinical Interpretation: Moderate evidence supports integration into multimodal dermatologic management.

 

Microbiome analyses indicate that probiotic supplementation can influence cutaneous microbial composition, suggesting a bidirectional gut–skin axis.

Changes in skin microbiota profiles have been observed following dietary probiotic intervention, supporting the hypothesis that systemic immune modulation alters dermatologic microbial ecosystems (Lin et al., 2024).

Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunction

 

Mechanism: SCFA signaling, modulation of lipid metabolism, and microbiome-driven energy regulation.

Evidence: Controlled trials demonstrate improved weight loss and metabolic markers (Kang et al., 2024).

Clinical Interpretation: Supportive role within structured weight management programs.

 

Mechanistically, probiotic-induced weight modulation is associated with:

  • Altered microbial energy harvest efficiency

  • Reduced systemic inflammation

  • Improved insulin signaling pathways

 

Microbiome restructuring in obese dogs has been shown to correlate with improved metabolic biomarkers, including lipid profiles and inflammatory mediators (Kang et al., 2024).

Immune Modulation

 

Mechanism: Cytokine regulation and enhancement of mucosal immunity.

Evidence: Controlled studies show improved immune biomarkers (Xu et al., 2019).

Clinical Interpretation: Relevant in stress, growth, or immune-challenged states.

Mechanistically, immune modulation by probiotics involves:

  • Enhanced secretory IgA production

  • Improved antigen tolerance at mucosal surfaces

  • Reduced systemic inflammatory signaling

 

These effects are particularly relevant in stress-induced immunosuppressive environments, where microbiome stability is critical for maintaining immune resilience.

Dosage and Clinical Use

Dosage is strain-specific, but general clinical ranges include:

  • Therapeutic dosing: ≥10⁹ CFU/day

  • Maintenance dosing: lower, consistent administration

Forms

 

  • Capsules

  • Powders

  • Diet-incorporated formulations

Bioavailability Factors

  • Gastric acid survival

  • Strain stability

  • Delivery matrix

Safety and Limitations

Safety

  • Generally well tolerated

  • Mild gastrointestinal effects may occur

Contraindications

 

  • Severe immunocompromised states (theoretical risk)

  • Poor-quality or unvalidated strains

Limitations

  • Strain-specific variability

  • Heterogeneous study outcomes

  • Limited long-term canine trials

Translational and Methodological Constraints

Interpretation of probiotic research in dogs is limited by several methodological factors:

  • Heterogeneity in study design: Differences in strains, dosages, and outcome measures reduce comparability

  • Small sample sizes in clinical trials: Limit statistical power and generalizability

  • Reliance on human microbiome data: Many mechanistic insights are extrapolated from non-canine models

  • Variability in baseline microbiome composition: Individual differences significantly influence response to probiotic intervention

 

These limitations highlight the importance of interpreting probiotic efficacy within a context-specific and evidence-weighted framework.

Evidence Summary

 

Probiotic efficacy is condition-dependent and strain-specific:

  • Strong: acute diarrhea

  • Moderate–strong: chronic enteropathy

  • Moderate: dermatologic disease, dysbiosis

  • Emerging: metabolic disorders

Biomarkers and Outcome Measures

 

Clinical studies increasingly rely on:

  • Microbiome sequencing

  • SCFA profiles

  • Cytokine panels

  • Fecal inflammatory biomarkers

 

These biomarkers provide insight into mechanistic effects, even when clinical outcomes vary.

Emerging Diagnostic Integration

 

Advanced diagnostic approaches are increasingly used to evaluate probiotic efficacy:

  • Metagenomic sequencing: Provides functional and compositional microbiome data

  • Metabolomics: Identifies microbial metabolic outputs linked to host physiology

  • Inflammatory biomarker panels: Quantify cytokine activity and immune response

 

These tools enable more precise evaluation of mechanism-driven outcomes, although their use remains limited in routine clinical practice.

Strength of Evidence by Condition

  • Acute diarrhea: Strong

  • Chronic enteropathy: Moderate–strong

  • Dysbiosis: Moderate

  • Atopic dermatitis: Moderate

  • Obesity: Emerging

  • Immune support: Moderate

Evidence Hierarchy and Interpretation

 

Probiotic research in canine nutrition spans multiple levels of evidence, including:

  • Randomized controlled trials

  • Controlled feeding studies

  • Observational and microbiome analyses

  • In vitro and mechanistic investigations

 

While randomized trials provide the strongest clinical evidence, mechanistic studies offer critical insight into biological plausibility and pathway-level effects.

A comprehensive evaluation of probiotics, therefore, requires integration of:

  • Clinical outcomes

  • Biomarker responses

  • Mechanistic consistency

 

This layered approach aligns with evidence-based veterinary frameworks, where biological plausibility strengthens clinical interpretation even when outcome variability exists.

Practical Clinical Integration

When to Use

  • Gastrointestinal disease

  • Post-antibiotic recovery

  • Dermatologic inflammation

  • Metabolic support

When to Avoid

  • Lack of strain-specific evidence

  • Severe disease without primary therapy

Role in Multimodal Nutrition

Probiotics function as:

  • Microbiome regulators

  • Immune modulators

  • Metabolic signaling mediators

 

Their effectiveness increases when combined with coordinated dietary strategies, including optimizing digestibility, modulating fiber, and adjusting macronutrient composition.

 

In particular, the interaction between probiotics and dietary fat is clinically relevant, as microbial metabolism influences bile acid transformation, lipid absorption, and systemic metabolic signaling. These interactions are further explored in the VetFarmacy evidence review on fat composition and metabolic health, which outlines how dietary fat profiles interact with the gut microbiome to modulate inflammation and metabolic outcomes.

Related Conditions

 

Evidence Notes

 

  • Effects are strain-specific and not universally transferable

  • High inter-individual microbiome variability

  • Frequent reliance on human data translation

  • Study heterogeneity limits standardization

Refer to:

Understanding when and how to use probiotics requires more than knowledge of microbial strains and mechanisms—it requires applying those effects within a structured clinical nutrition framework.

The VetFarmacy Veterinary Diet Decision Framework for Dogs provides a systematic approach that veterinarians use to match diet strategies to specific disease processes, including gastrointestinal disorders, dermatologic conditions, metabolic dysfunction, and more.

This framework explains:

  • How microbiome-targeted interventions influence underlying physiology

  • Why do different conditions require distinct nutritional strategies

  • How functional ingredients like probiotics fit into broader therapeutic plans

 

​​This resource bridges the gap between microbiome science and clinical decision-making, ensuring that probiotic interventions are aligned with disease mechanisms, nutritional context, and individual patient needs.

References

  • Bonel-Ayuso, D., Pineda-Pampliega, J., García, P., Fernández-Muela, M., De La Fuente, J., Fernandez, P., & Redondo, B. (2025). Effects of postbiotic administration on canine health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microorganisms, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13071572

  • Jang, H., Son, S., Kim, J., Jung, M., Choi, Y., Kim, D., Lee, H., Shin, D., & Kim, Y. (2021). Characterization and functional test of canine probiotics. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 625562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.625562

  • Jensen, A. P., & Bjørnvad, C. R. (2019). Clinical effect of probiotics in prevention or treatment of gastrointestinal disease in dogs: A systematic review. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 33(5), 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15554

  • Kang, A., Kwak, M., Lee, D., Lee, J., Kim, M., Song, M., Lee, M., Yang, J., Oh, S., & Kim, Y. (2024). Dietary supplementation with probiotics promotes weight loss by reshaping the gut microbiome and energy metabolism in obese dogs. Microbiology Spectrum, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02552-23

  • Kelley, R. L., Minikhiem, D., Kiely, B., O’Mahony, L., O’Sullivan, D., Boileau, T., & Park, J. (2017). Clinical benefits of probiotic canine-derived Bifidobacterium animalis strain AHC7 in dogs with acute idiopathic diarrhea. Veterinary Therapeutics, 10(3), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-31198

  • Lin, C., Daristotle, L., & Frantz, N. (2024). Skin microbial compositions differ among dog body sites and are affected by dietary probiotics. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae234.637

  • Liu, Y., Wang, J., Zheng, H., Xin, J., Zhong, Z., Liu, H., Fu, H., Zhou, Z., Qiu, X., & Peng, G. (2024). Multi-functional properties of lactic acid bacteria strains derived from canine feces. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1404580

  • Pacheco, R., Lins, L., De Brito, L., De Andrade Calaça, P., Porto, A., & Cavalcanti, M. (2025). Probiotics as an adjunct in the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 87(7), 1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.24-0471

  • Pilla, R., & Suchodolski, J. S. (2020). The role of the canine gut microbiome and metabolome in health and gastrointestinal disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00498

  • Schmitz, S., & Suchodolski, J. S. (2016). Understanding the canine intestinal microbiota and its modification by pro-, pre-, and synbiotics – What is the evidence? Veterinary Medicine and Science, 2(2), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.17

  • Wernimont, S. M., Radosevich, J., Jackson, M. I., Ephraim, E., Badri, D. V., MacLeay, J. M., Jewell, D. E., & Suchodolski, J. S. (2020). The effects of nutrition on the gastrointestinal microbiome of cats and dogs: Impact on health and disease. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, 1266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01266

  • White, R., Atherly, T., Guard, B., Rossi, G., Wang, C., Mosher, C., Webb, C., Hill, S., Ackermann, M., Sciabarra, P., Allenspach, K., Suchodolski, J., & Jergens, A. (2017). Randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effect of a multi-strain probiotic on the mucosal microbiota in canine idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes, 8(5), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2017.1334754

  • Xu, H., Huang, W., Hou, Q., Kwok, L., Laga, W., Wang, Y., Sun, Z., & Zhang, H. (2019). Oral administration of compound probiotics improved canine feed intake, weight gain, immunity and intestinal microbiota. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, 666. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00666

  • Xu, H., Zhao, F., Hou, Q., Huang, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Sun, Z. (2019). Metagenomic analysis revealed beneficial effects of probiotics in improving the composition and function of the gut microbiota in dogs with diarrhoea. Food & Function, 10(5), 2618–2629. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9fo00087a

  • Zhang, R., Hu, W., Zhong, S., Chen, W., Xie, S., Chen, M., & Yu, Q. (2025). The alleviating effects and mechanisms of Enterococcus faecium Kimate-X and Lactobacillus plantarum Kimate-F combination on canine inflammatory bowel disease. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1534665

bottom of page