top of page

Diet and Canine Atopic Dermatitis: Evidence-Based Nutritional Strategies

 

VetFarmacy Clinical Evidence Library

Body System: Dermatologic and Gastrointestinal Nutrition

Author: Dr. Athena Angela Gaffud

Content Type: Condition Evidence Overview

Evidence Base: Peer-reviewed veterinary and translational literature synthesis

Last Reviewed: 2026

Purpose: Evidence-based synthesis of current veterinary and translational literature evaluating the role of nutrition in canine atopic dermatitis and its underlying disease mechanisms

Evidence Transparency

 

This article synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed veterinary dermatology and nutrition research, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, microbiome and metabolomic investigations, and relevant translational literature related to immune dysregulation, barrier dysfunction, and nutritional modulation in canine atopic dermatitis.

Because long-term randomized dietary trials in dogs with naturally occurring atopic dermatitis remain limited, portions of this analysis rely on mechanistic evidence, controlled feeding studies, observational data, and cross-species translational research in human atopic dermatitis and immunology. Where applicable, distinctions between established clinical evidence, emerging research, and biologically plausible mechanisms are explicitly integrated into the discussion.

 

This content is intended for educational purposes, to interpret veterinary clinical nutrition research, and to support evidence-informed decision-making. It does not replace individualized veterinary diagnosis, treatment, or dietary planning.

Definition and Disease Classification

 

Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, epidermal barrier dysfunction, and immune dysregulation. It is increasingly recognized as a multisystem disorder involving dermatologic and gastrointestinal axes, where diet influences both disease expression and therapeutic response.

From a clinical nutrition perspective, the canine atopic dermatitis diet is not merely supportive but mechanistically relevant, influencing immune signaling, lipid metabolism, microbiome composition, and epithelial integrity. Epidemiologic and clinical data demonstrate that dietary exposures—particularly early-life feeding patterns and macronutrient composition—modulate disease risk and severity (Hemida et al., 2021).

This page situates CAD within the broader context of gastrointestinal health, emphasizing the gut–skin axis and the regulation of systemic inflammation. See canine gastrointestinal system overview.

Pathophysiology of Canine Atopic Dermatitis

 

Barrier Dysfunction and Lipid Metabolism

 

Claim: CAD is fundamentally a disorder of epidermal barrier failure.
Mechanism: Altered lipid metabolism, particularly reduced ceramides and disrupted lamellar structures, increases transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and allergen penetration.
Clinical relevance: Barrier compromise amplifies antigen exposure and sustains chronic inflammation.

 

Claim: Epidermal barrier dysfunction in canine atopic dermatitis is not limited to lipid deficiency but involves coordinated alterations in structural proteins and gene expression.
Mechanism: Transcriptomic analyses demonstrate downregulation of genes involved in keratinocyte differentiation, including filaggrin and involucrin, as well as dysregulation of lipid synthesis pathways. These changes impair both physical and biochemical barrier integrity, increasing permeability to allergens and microbial antigens.
Clinical relevance: This dual impairment explains why barrier repair requires both lipid repletion and modulation of epidermal turnover.

Emerging evidence: Diet-dependent transcriptomic shifts have been demonstrated in atopic dogs, indicating that nutrition can directly influence skin gene expression profiles (Anturaniemi et al., 2020).

 

Claim: Biomarkers provide objective insight into disease mechanisms and nutritional response.
Mechanism: Key biomarkers include transepidermal water loss (TEWL), serum IgE, and cytokines such as IL-31, which directly correlate with pruritus severity. Additionally, metabolomic profiling reveals altered lipid metabolites and amino acid pathways in atopic dogs.
Clinical relevance: Nutritional interventions that normalize these biomarkers are associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Emerging evidence: Metabolomic studies highlight significant alterations in lipid metabolism between healthy and atopic dogs, reinforcing the metabolic component of disease mechanisms (Moore et al., 2020). Disruptions in lipid composition are linked to altered eicosanoid metabolism, shifting toward pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., leukotrienes) (Pucheu-Haston et al., 2015).

Claim: Alterations in lipid metabolism are central to the inflammatory phenotype of canine atopic dermatitis.
Mechanism: Increased availability of omega-6 fatty acids promotes the synthesis of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids, including prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4, which enhance vasodilation, pruritus, and leukocyte recruitment. In contrast, omega-3 fatty acids generate less inflammatory or pro-resolving mediators such as resolvins and protectins.
Clinical relevance: The balance between omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids directly influences the intensity and persistence of inflammation.

Strong evidence: Mechanistic and clinical studies support the role of lipid modulation in reducing inflammatory signaling and improving dermatologic outcomes (Pucheu-Haston et al., 2015).

Immune Dysregulation and Inflammatory Pathways

 

Claim: CAD is driven by Th2-skewed immune responses.
Mechanism: Upregulation of cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 promotes IgE production and pruritus signaling. Activation of NF-κB pathways sustains inflammatory cascades.
Clinical relevance: Persistent inflammation contributes to chronic skin lesions and secondary infections. ICADA updates confirm that immune dysregulation is central to the pathogenesis of CAD (Eisenschenk et al., 2023).

 

Claim: Immune dysregulation in canine atopic dermatitis extends beyond Th2 polarization and involves complex interactions between innate and adaptive immune pathways.
Mechanism: Activation of dendritic cells and keratinocytes leads to the release of alarmins such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), which further amplifies Th2-driven inflammation. Concurrently, impaired regulatory T-cell (Treg) function reduces immune tolerance to environmental and dietary antigens. Dysregulation of antimicrobial peptides also contributes to altered host defense and microbial colonization.
Clinical relevance: These mechanisms explain the persistence and recurrence of inflammation despite symptomatic control and highlight the importance of interventions that restore immune balance.

Emerging evidence: Recent updates in canine atopic dermatitis pathogenesis emphasize the interplay between innate immunity, barrier dysfunction, and environmental triggers in sustaining chronic inflammation (Santoro et al., 2023).

Gut–Skin Axis and Microbiome Dysbiosis

 

Claim: Gastrointestinal dysbiosis contributes to CAD progression.
Mechanism: Altered microbial composition reduces short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, impairing regulatory T-cell (Treg) function and increasing systemic inflammation.
Clinical relevance: Microbiome-targeted nutrition can modulate immune tolerance.

Recent microbiome studies show reduced diversity in CAD dogs, with restoration following dietary modification (Swain et al., 2025).

Claim: The gut–skin axis represents a bidirectional regulatory system linking intestinal health with dermatologic inflammation.
Mechanism: Increased intestinal permeability (“leaky gut”) allows translocation of dietary antigens and microbial products such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which activate systemic immune responses via Toll-like receptor signaling. This promotes Th2 polarization and amplifies cutaneous inflammation.
Clinical relevance: Restoration of gut barrier integrity is a key therapeutic target in the nutritional management of atopic dermatitis in dogs.

Emerging evidence: Dietary modulation has been shown to restore microbial diversity and reduce clinical severity, supporting the role of microbiome-targeted interventions (Badri et al., 2024).

Extrapolated evidence: Human and translational models further support the role of intestinal permeability and microbial metabolites in driving systemic allergic inflammation (Xu et al., 2025).

Oxidative Stress and Cellular Injury

 

Claim: Oxidative stress amplifies tissue damage in CAD.
Mechanism: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) impair keratinocyte function and disrupt tight junction proteins.
Clinical relevance: Antioxidant status becomes a critical modulator of disease severity.

Claim: Oxidative stress contributes to both initiation and progression of cellular injury in atopic dermatitis.
Mechanism: Excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage keratinocyte membranes, disrupt mitochondrial function, and impair cellular repair mechanisms. Oxidative stress also activates NF-κB signaling, further amplifying inflammatory responses.
Clinical relevance: Persistent oxidative damage delays barrier repair and perpetuates chronic inflammation.

Emerging evidence: Dietary antioxidant interventions have been shown to reduce both immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions in canine models (Banovic et al., 2019).

Nutritional Risk Factors

Macronutrient Imbalance and Lipid Quality

 

Claim: Fat composition influences inflammatory burden.
Mechanism: Diets high in omega-6 fatty acids increase arachidonic acid-derived eicosanoids.
Clinical relevance: Imbalanced lipid intake exacerbates pruritus and inflammation.

See: fat composition and metabolic health

Ultra-Processed Diets and Additives

 

Claim: Ultra-processed diets contribute to dysbiosis and barrier dysfunction.
Mechanism: Additives, oxidized fats, and low fiber reduce microbial diversity and increase intestinal permeability.
Clinical relevance: Chronic exposure may increase susceptibility to allergic disease. (Boggio et al., 2025)

 

Claim: Early-life nutrition is a determinant of long-term atopic risk.
Mechanism: Dietary exposures during developmental windows influence immune tolerance through microbiome programming and epigenetic regulation of immune pathways. Diets high in processed ingredients and low in microbial diversity may impair immune education.
Clinical relevance: Preventive nutrition strategies may reduce the incidence of atopic dermatitis.

Strong evidence: Longitudinal data demonstrate associations between early dietary patterns and later development of atopic signs in dogs (Hemida et al., 2021).

 

Claim: Western-style dietary patterns contribute to inflammatory disease mechanisms.
Mechanism: High levels of refined carbohydrates, oxidized lipids, and additives promote oxidative stress, dysbiosis, and epithelial barrier dysfunction.
Clinical relevance: Chronic dietary exposure may exacerbate disease severity and reduce responsiveness to therapy.

Emerging evidence: Nutritional patterns associated with ultra-processed foods are linked to increased risk of inflammatory skin conditions (Boggio et al., 2025).

Protein Antigen Exposure

 

Claim: Dietary proteins can act as allergens.
Mechanism: Increased intestinal permeability allows antigen translocation, triggering immune responses.
Clinical relevance: Food-responsive enteropathy overlaps with CAD.

Micronutrient Deficiencies

 

Claim: Deficiencies impair barrier repair and immune regulation.
Mechanism: Zinc, vitamin E, and essential fatty acids act as cofactors in epithelial turnover and antioxidant defense.
Clinical relevance: Deficiency states worsen clinical outcomes.

Evidence-Based Nutritional Strategies

Fat

 

Claim: Lipid modulation alters inflammatory signaling.
Mechanism: Omega-3 fatty acids (EPA/DHA) compete with arachidonic acid, reducing pro-inflammatory eicosanoids.
Clinical relevance: Improved pruritus and lesion scores.

Strong evidence: Randomized trials demonstrate reduced pruritus with therapeutic diets (Watson et al., 2021).

Protein

 

Claim: Protein quality influences immune activation and tissue repair.
Mechanism: Highly digestible proteins reduce antigen exposure and support nitrogen balance.
Clinical relevance: Improved tolerance and reduced hypersensitivity reactions.

Strong evidence: Controlled trials confirm reduced clinical signs with dietary protein modification (Weemhoff et al., 2021).

See: protein levels and sources in canine diet

Claim: Protein metabolism plays a dual role in both immune modulation and tissue repair in canine atopic dermatitis.
Mechanism: Amino acids such as glutamine and arginine support enterocyte function, enhance tight junction integrity, and modulate immune cell activity. Inadequate protein digestibility increases antigenic exposure within the gut, contributing to hypersensitivity reactions.
Clinical relevance: Optimizing protein quality reduces antigen load while supporting barrier repair and immune regulation.

Emerging evidence: Studies suggest that dietary interventions targeting protein digestibility and amino acid balance can improve both gastrointestinal and dermatologic outcomes in atopic dogs (Eisenschenk, 2024).

Carbohydrates and Fiber

 

Claim: Fiber modulates microbiome and immune signaling.
Mechanism: Fermentable fibers increase SCFA production, enhancing Treg activity.
Clinical relevance: Reduced systemic inflammation and improved barrier integrity.

Emerging evidence: Indicates that microbiome modulation improves dermatologic outcomes (Xu et al., 2025).

See: gut microbiome and digestive health

Claim: Carbohydrate quality influences metabolic and inflammatory pathways relevant to atopic dermatitis.
Mechanism: High glycemic diets increase insulin signaling and may indirectly influence inflammatory pathways through oxidative stress and lipid metabolism. Conversely, low-glycemic, fiber-rich diets support microbial fermentation and SCFA production, which regulate immune tolerance.
Clinical relevance: Glycemic control may reduce the inflammatory burden and improve skin health.

Extrapolated evidence: Human and translational studies suggest that dietary glycemic load can influence inflammatory skin conditions, although species-specific data remain limited (Kanda et al., 2021).

Micronutrients

 

Claim: Antioxidants mitigate oxidative damage.
Mechanism: Vitamins E, A, and trace minerals regulate oxidative stress and cellular repair.
Clinical relevance: Reduced lesion severity and improved skin barrier.

Emerging evidence: Anti-inflammatory diets improve allergic responses (Banovic et al., 2019).

Claim: Nutritional interventions exert multi-layered effects across metabolic, immune, and microbial systems.
Mechanism: Integrated dietary strategies simultaneously modulate lipid signaling pathways, improve gut barrier integrity, and regulate immune responses, resulting in cumulative clinical benefits.
Clinical relevance: Multimodal nutritional approaches are more effective than single-nutrient interventions.

Strong evidence: Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that comprehensive therapeutic diets significantly reduce pruritus scores and medication requirements (De Santiago et al., 2021; Watson et al., 2021).

 

Claim: Nutritional modulation of the skin microbiome is an emerging therapeutic target.
Mechanism: Diet influences microbial composition through substrate availability and immune-mediated selection pressures, altering colonization resistance and inflammatory signaling.
Clinical relevance: Improved microbial balance is associated with reduced lesion severity and infection risk.

Emerging evidence: Dietary interventions have been shown to modulate both gut and skin microbiota, improving clinical dermatologic outcomes (Badri et al., 2024). Potential improvement in inflammatory markers.

 

Claim: Elimination diets remain a cornerstone in differentiating food-responsive disease from environmental atopy.
Mechanism: Removal of antigenic proteins reduces immune activation, thereby allowing assessment of dietary hypersensitivity.
Clinical relevance: Accurate identification of food allergens informs long-term nutritional management.

Strong evidence: Controlled clinical trials demonstrate a significant reduction in clinical signs following elimination diet protocols (Weemhoff et al., 2021).

Extrapolated evidence: Systematic reviews in human atopic dermatitis support elimination strategies in selected cases, although variability in response highlights the complexity of disease mechanisms (Oykhman et al., 2022).

Functional Ingredients in Canine Atopic Dermatitis

 

Mechanisms summarized:

 

Explore the functional roles of ingredients in the canine nutrition ingredients hub.

 

Claim: Functional ingredients exert synergistic effects when combined within a structured dietary framework.
Mechanism: Concurrent modulation of lipid signaling, microbial composition, and epithelial integrity enhances overall therapeutic impact. For example, combining omega-3 fatty acids with probiotics may simultaneously reduce inflammation and restore immune tolerance.
Clinical relevance: Multi-ingredient strategies may provide greater clinical benefit than isolated supplementation.

Emerging evidence: Dietary formulations incorporating multiple functional components have demonstrated improved clinical scores and reduced pruritus in dogs with atopic dermatitis (De Santiago et al., 2021).

Dietary Approaches

Therapeutic Diets

 

Claim: Formulated diets reduce clinical severity.
Mechanism: Combined nutrient modulation targets inflammation, barrier repair, and microbiome balance.
Clinical relevance: Reduced medication reliance and improved quality of life.

Strong evidence: Clinical trials demonstrate reduced pruritus and medication scores (Watson et al., 2021).

Fresh vs Processed Diets

 

Claim: Diet processing level influences metabolic and microbiome outcomes.
Mechanism: Fresh diets provide higher nutrient bioavailability and fewer oxidized compounds.
Clinical relevance: Potential improvement in inflammatory markers.

See: fresh diets in dogs

Emerging evidence supports improved outcomes with less processed diets (Lopes & Lopes, 2025).

VetFarmacy Clinical Resource

Readers seeking a structured approach to selecting diets for allergic skin disease and atopic dermatitis can access the VetFarmacy clinical guide:

Veterinary Diet Decision Framework for Dogs
This evidence-based reference explains how veterinarians evaluate diet strategies for conditions involving immune dysregulation, inflammation, and microbiome disruption. It outlines how nutritional factors, such as protein type, fat composition, digestibility, and fiber, influence clinical outcomes in dermatologic and gastrointestinal diseases.

 

The framework includes specific guidance for:

  • Elimination diet trials in suspected food allergens

  • Anti-inflammatory diet strategies targeting lipid-mediated inflammation

  • Microbiome-supportive nutrition for gut–skin axis modulation

Subscribers gain access to structured clinical tools that translate evidence into practical dietary decision-making.

Clinical Outcomes and Evidence Summary

 

Clinical outcomes in canine atopic dermatitis are multifactorial and influenced by both disease severity and nutritional intervention strategy. Outcome measures commonly include pruritus scoring systems, lesion severity indices, and medication usage, alongside emerging biomarkers such as cytokine profiles and microbiome diversity.

 

Claim: Nutritional interventions produce measurable improvements across multiple clinical endpoints.
Mechanism: Reduction in inflammatory signaling, improved barrier integrity, and enhanced immune regulation collectively contribute to clinical improvement.
Clinical relevance: Multidimensional outcome assessment provides a more accurate evaluation of therapeutic success.

Strong Evidence

  • Therapeutic diets reduce pruritus and medication use

  • Protein modification improves food-responsive cases

  • Omega-3 supplementation reduces inflammatory signaling

Emerging Evidence

  • Microbiome-targeted nutrition improves immune regulation

  • Fresh diets may enhance metabolic outcomes

Uncertain / Variable

  • Specific micronutrient dosing strategies

  • Long-term microbiome manipulation effects

Evidence synthesis: inflammation and nutritional modulation
Full repository: VetFarmacy Evidence Library

Clinical Decision Support

 

Clinical application requires integration of:

  • Disease phenotype (pruritic vs food-responsive)

  • Biomarkers (IgE, cytokines, TEWL)

  • Gastrointestinal status (dysbiosis, digestibility)

  • Nutrient tolerability

 

Decision pathways should align with structured query frameworks.
See: Low-Fat, Hydrolyzed, and Fresh Diets: A Clinical Decision Framework for GI Disease

 

Cross-system relevance: CAD shares inflammatory and metabolic pathways with pancreatic disease.
Related: dietary fat and canine pancreatitis

 

Claim: Clinical decision-making in canine atopic dermatitis requires integration of nutritional, immunologic, and gastrointestinal data.
Mechanism: Structured frameworks allow clinicians to align dietary interventions with specific disease mechanisms, such as inflammation, dysbiosis, or barrier dysfunction.
Clinical relevance: This approach improves dietary selection precision and enhances therapeutic outcomes.

Key Takeaways

 

Lipotoxicity: Excess lipid-driven inflammation contributing to tissue damage.
Barrier dysfunction: Impaired epidermal integrity allowing allergen penetration.
Gut–skin axis: Interaction between microbiome and dermatologic health.
Dysbiosis: Microbial imbalance promoting systemic inflammation.
Eicosanoid shift: Altered lipid mediators driving inflammatory signaling.
Oxidative stress: Cellular damage caused by reactive oxygen species.
Immune dysregulation: Th2-dominant response underlying allergic disease.
Nutrient bioavailability: The degree to which nutrients are absorbed and utilized.

Evidence Notes

  • Strong evidence supports dietary modulation as an adjunct therapy in CAD

  • Microbiome and metabolomics data remain emerging

  • Many findings are partially extrapolated from human dermatology

  • Clinical heterogeneity limits uniform dietary recommendations

  • Trial design variability introduces interpretive limitations
    See: limitations of veterinary clinical trials

VetFarmacy Clinical Resource

 

Nutritional management of canine atopic dermatitis requires integrating pathophysiology, dietary mechanisms, and individual patient response. VetFarmacy provides downloadable clinical frameworks that translate evidence into structured decision-making tools.

The Veterinary Diet Decision Framework for Dogs details how veterinarians match diet strategies to disease mechanisms, including:

  • Immune-mediated inflammation and hypersensitivity

  • Gut microbiome disruption and intestinal permeability

  • Lipid metabolism and inflammatory signaling pathways

 

It also explains how diet trials are selected, monitored, and adjusted in clinical practice, particularly for conditions involving chronic pruritus, allergic skin disease, and food-responsive dermatitis.

Subscribers receive access to current and future VetFarmacy clinical resources as new evidence emerges.

References

  • Anturaniemi, J., Zaldívar-López, S., Savelkoul, H., Elo, K., & Hielm-Björkman, A. (2020). The effect of atopic dermatitis and diet on the skin transcriptome in Staffordshire Bull Terriers. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 552251. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.552251

  • Badri, D., & Panickar, K. (2022). Dietary intervention alleviates signs of atopic dermatitis in dogs by improving gut, skin and systemic immunity. Current Developments in Nutrition, 6(Supplement 1), 462–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac058.001

  • Badri, D., Panickar, K., & Tavener, S. (2024). Nutritional intervention alleviates signs of dermatological problems in dogs by modulating immune regulation and skin microbiome. Current Developments in Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.103452

  • Banovic, F., Blubaugh, A., Denley, T., & Lemo, N. (2019). The effect of anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant diet on immediate and late-phase cutaneous allergic reactions in healthy dogs. Veterinarski Arhiv. https://doi.org/10.24099/vet.arhiv.0659

  • Boehm, T., Klinger, C., Udraite-Vovk, L., Navarro, C., & Mueller, R. (2021). Clinical effects of two commercially available diets on canine atopic dermatitis. Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe K: Kleintiere / Heimtiere, 49(4), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1543-4743

  • Boggio, C., Veronese, F., Armari, M., Zavattaro, E., Esposto, E., Savoia, P., & Azzimonti, B. (2025). The Western diet and atopic dermatitis: The potential role of nutrients, contaminants, and additives in dysbiosis and epithelial barrier dysfunction. Antioxidants, 14(4), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14040386

  • Chrzanowska, E., Winiarska-Mieczan, A., & Jachimowicz-Rogowska, K. (2023). Diet therapy as support for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Aesthetic Cosmetology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.52336/acm.2023.010

  • Chu, D. K., Schneider, L., Asiniwasis, R., Boguniewicz, M., De Benedetto, A., Ellison, K., Frazier, W., Greenhawt, M., Huynh, J., Kim, E., LeBovidge, J., Lind, M., Lio, P., Martin, S., O’Brien, M., Ong, P., Silverberg, J., Spergel, J., Wang, J., Wheeler, K., Guyatt, G., Capozza, K., Begolka, W., Chu, A., Zhao, I., Chen, L., Oykhman, P., Bakaa, L., Golden, D., Shaker, M., Bernstein, J., Horner, C., Lieberman, J., Stukus, D., Rank, M., Ellis, A., Abrams, E., Ledford, D., & Chu, D. (2023). Atopic dermatitis (eczema) guidelines: 2023 AAAAI/ACAAI Joint Task Force recommendations. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2023.11.009

  • Craig, J. M. (2016). Atopic dermatitis and the intestinal microbiota in humans and dogs. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 2(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.24

  • De Santiago, M., Arribas, J., Llamas, Y., Bečvářová, I., & Meyer, H. (2021). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial measuring the effect of a dietetic food on dermatologic scoring and pruritus in dogs with atopic dermatitis. BMC Veterinary Research, 17, 355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03063-w

  • Eisenschenk, M. (2024). The role of diet, nutrition, and supplements in canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2024.11.003

  • Eisenschenk, M., Hensel, P., Saridomichelakis, M., Tamamoto-Mochizuki, C., Pucheu-Haston, C., & Santoro, D. (2023). Introduction to ICADA 2023 canine atopic dermatitis pathogenesis review articles and updated definition. Veterinary Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.13183

  • Fernandes, B., Alves, S., Schmidt, V., Bizarro, A., Pinto, M., Pereira, H., Marto, J., & Lourenço, A. (2023). Primary prevention of canine atopic dermatitis: Breaking the cycle. Veterinary Sciences, 10(11), 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10110659

  • Frizzo-Ramos, C., Doulidis, P., Burgener, I., Ungerböck, C., Einspieler, V., Weiser, U., Panakova, L., & Roth-Walter, F. (2025). Lymph food to improve canine atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1657869

  • Glos, K., Linek, M., Loewenstein, C., Mayer, U., & Mueller, R. (2008). The efficacy of commercially available veterinary diets recommended for dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology, 19(5), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00688.x

  • Hemida, M., Salin, S., Vuori, K., Moore, R., Anturaniemi, J., Rosendahl, S., Barrouin-Melo, S., & Hielm-Björkman, A. (2021). Puppyhood diet as a factor in the development of atopy in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 35, 2374–2383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16211

  • Hensel, P., Santoro, D., Favrot, C., Hill, P., & Griffin, C. (2015). Canine atopic dermatitis: Diagnosis and allergen identification guidelines. BMC Veterinary Research, 11, 196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0515-5

  • Hensel, P., Saridomichelakis, M., Eisenschenk, M., Tamamoto-Mochizuki, C., Pucheu-Haston, C., & Santoro, D. (2023). Genetic, environmental, and allergen factors in CAD. Veterinary Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.13210

  • Kanda, N., Hoashi, T., & Saeki, H. (2021). Nutrition and atopic dermatitis. Journal of Nippon Medical School. https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.jnms.2021_88-317

  • Khan, A., Adalsteinsson, J., & Whitaker-Worth, D. (2021). Atopic dermatitis and nutrition. Clinics in Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.10.006

  • Lim, N. R., Lohman, M. E., & Lio, P. A. (2017). Elimination diets in atopic dermatitis. Pediatric Dermatology, 34, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.13244

  • Marsella, R. (2021). Advances in canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12965

  • Moore, R., Anturaniemi, J., Velagapudi, V., Nandania, J., Barrouin-Melo, S., & Hielm-Björkman, A. (2020). Metabolomics in atopic dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.554296

  • Olivry, T., & Bizikova, P. (2013). Systematic review of CAD interventions. Veterinary Dermatology, 24, 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01088.x

  • Olivry, T., DeBoer, D., Favrot, C., Jackson, H., Mueller, R., Nuttall, T., & Prélaud, P. (2015). ICADA treatment guidelines. BMC Veterinary Research, 11, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0514-6

  • Oykhman, P., Dookie, J., Al-Rammahy, H., et al. (2022). Dietary elimination for atopic dermatitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2022.06.044

  • Papapostolou, N., Xepapadaki, P., Gregoriou, S., & Makris, M. (2022). Atopic dermatitis and food allergy interplay. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144232

  • Pucheu-Haston, C. M., Santoro, D., Bizikova, P., Eisenschenk, M., Marsella, R., & Nuttall, T. (2015). Innate immunity and lipid metabolism in CAD. Veterinary Dermatology, 26, 104–e28. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.12199

  • Santoro, D. (2019). Therapies in canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 49, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2018.08.002

  • Santoro, D., Saridomichelakis, M., Eisenschenk, M., Tamamoto-Mochizuki, C., Hensel, P., & Pucheu-Haston, C. (2023). Skin barrier and microbiome in CAD. Veterinary Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.13215

  • Sofou, E., Aleksandrova, S., Chatzis, M., Badulescu, E., & Saridomichelakis, M. (2024). Clinical criteria for adverse food reactions in CAD. Veterinary Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.13247

  • Swain, S., Sahoo, P., Biswal, S., Sethy, K., Panda, A., & Sahoo, N. (2025). Microbiota diversity in atopic dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.09.0274

  • Watson, A., Rostaher, A., Fischer, N., & Favrot, C. (2021). Therapeutic diet reduces CAD severity. Veterinary Dermatology, 33, 55–e18. https://doi.org/10.1111/vde.13020

  • Weemhoff, J., MacLeay, J., Brejda, J., Schiefelbein, H., Wernimont, S., & Gross, K. (2021). Nutritional control of scratching in CAD. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 35, 1884–1892. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16193

  • Xu, F., Jiang, X., Jin, Y., Yang, Y., Chen, X., & Chen, Y. (2025). Gut microbiota and atopic dermatitis. Frontiers in Immunology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1635262

 

Evidence Review History

First published: 2026
Last evidence review: 2026

Future updates will incorporate newly published veterinary clinical trials and systematic reviews related to dietary fat and pancreatic disease in dogs.

bottom of page